Marquez Foot stopper against Pacman III

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
2,251
9
0
46
#8
i don't see how he was robbed? landed less, threw less, not the aggressor, didn't do any damage. i think the fight couldve went 3 ways like i said in the other thread, but he damn sure wasnt robbed.
 
Feb 1, 2009
1,234
10
38
49
#9
So that's why manny got his ass handed to him? LMFAO.

Steriods vs stepping on feet!!

BTW On face off Marquez had already said his adjustment was going to be positioning.
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,251
9
0
46
#13
your a fuckin idiot to even compare it like that, but that's you. what i'm sayin is in a close ass fight like that being more aggressive especially in late rounds could be enough to sway the fight your way. if marquez was decisively winning than being the aggressor wouldnt matter. get it now you fuckin sheep?
 
Feb 1, 2009
1,234
10
38
49
#16
Because your an idiot. Marquez won that fight 8 rounds to 4...if that, So why would he get careless and in the last 2 rounds? To risk a knock down and and the judges could use that 1 point to give the fight to Pac, like in the second fight!

Whats the point of being the aggressor yet you cant get no clean solid punches in?
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,251
9
0
46
#17
lol your an idiont thinking he won 8 rounds period. how did he win 8 rounds when he landed less punches? if you tryin to become the champion you don't slack off and play it safe in a close fight. you go take them fuckin belts! fuck outta here wit that you sheep.
 
Apr 20, 2005
2,938
290
0
#18
which punches are worth more? clean punches or not so clean punches?

can someone please explain the math on that? are punches scored on solidness?

i really dont know. some u "experts" here know right? thats y ur on siccness talkin about it. and not on a judges seat tallying up all the punches that were landed.