Could Be Good News For Sonics Fans...

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jun 27, 2005
5,207
0
0
#1
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/sonics/2004264013_sonics06m.html

Microsoft CEO may chip in millions to keep Sonics

By Jim Brunner and Ralph Thomas

Seattle Times staff reporters

PREV of NEXT



Microsoft's Steve Ballmer is said to be part of an investor group.

Related

* Notebook | Sonics players surprised by margin in Okla. vote
* Archive | Oklahoma City passes arena tax to lure Sonics
* Archive | Business titans try to keep Sonics here
* Archive | Seattle rejected $26M offer to let Sonics go

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer and wireless magnate John Stanton are among the local investors behind an effort to buy the Sonics and cover half the cost of a $300 million KeyArena expansion to try to keep the team in Seattle, sources confirmed Wednesday.

Neither Stanton nor Ballmer could be reached for comment Wednesday night. The other members of the investment group, Costco CEO Jim Sinegal and Seattle developer Matt Griffin, have previously disclosed their own involvement.

Seattle leaders are pushing the offer of private cash as a "game changer" that ought to sway state legislators to pass an arena package to keep the Sonics from moving to team owner Clay Bennett's hometown of Oklahoma City.

The proposed 50-50 split beats anything put on the table by Sonics owners. Even some usual critics of taxpayer subsidies for pro sports — including anti-stadium activist Chris Van Dyk and Seattle City Councilmember Nick Licata — say it could be a good deal.

But Bennett has repeatedly said the Sonics aren't for sale. And the effort to push a bill through the Legislature in the waning days of the session may share the fate of similar proposals over the past three years that showed up late and fell flat.

"They do the same thing every year. They come in at the last minute," said House Majority Leader Lynn Kessler, D-Hoquiam. "I don't see it happening."

Lobbyists for the city circulated draft legislation Wednesday that would authorize taxpayer money for the KeyArena project. Under the proposal, the investors who hope to buy the Sonics or another NBA team would contribute $150 million in cash, with the remaining $150 million to be covered by public funds.

"It's late. It's very last minute, all the parties acknowledge that," said Seattle Deputy Mayor Tim Ceis, referring to the Legislature's scheduled adjournment next week. But if lawmakers pass up this chance, Ceis said, "the offer won't necessarily be there next year."

The possible involvement of Ballmer and Stanton has been the subject of much speculation, but their roles have been kept secret even from many of the lawmakers in Olympia being asked to approve the tax package. Stanton, who founded Western Wireless, was a part-owner of the team under the previous ownership group, led by Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz.

Ceis declined to comment Wednesday on whether Ballmer or Stanton were involved.

The proposal calls for raising $75 million by temporarily extending car-rental and restaurant taxes. Those taxes, collected only in King County, are currently used to pay off the debt on Safeco Field. The remaining $75 million in public funds would come from the city of Seattle, through an admissions tax at KeyArena or other revenues generated by the building.

The tax money would be tapped only if Ballmer's group is able to buy the Sonics or another NBA team and agrees to a "legally binding commitment" to pay $150 million, according to the draft legislation.

advertising

Griffin, who would not discuss the identities of other investors, said they all believe the team is a crucial part of Seattle's quality of life.

"Our friends believe that having good professional sports teams is important to a community just like great universities, operas and theaters," Griffin said. "Nobody goes to all of them, but they're the attributes that allow you to attract the best elements to a town."

The latest effort comes as the Sonics appear to be getting closer to a move to Oklahoma City.

Voters there Tuesday overwhelmingly approved $120 million in taxes for an arena upgrade and practice facility aimed at luring the Sonics.

Bennett is fighting the city in court to get out of the KeyArena lease before 2010.

Next month, NBA owners will meet to decide whether to approve Bennett's request to move the team.

Even if a competing arena plan is approved in Olympia, Ceis acknowledged there is no guarantee that Bennett would sell the team back to local owners. Bennett and a group of Oklahoma businessmen purchased the Sonics and Storm in 2006 for $350 million from Schultz's group. The Storm was sold in January to a group of Seattle-area owners for $10 million.

Ceis said without a viable arena plan here, the NBA won't consider another bid by a local ownership group to buy the Sonics or bring another franchise here as a replacement.

"There is a window here that this ownership group sees. A decision by the NBA will be made in the next couple months," Ceis said. "They believe now strategically is the right time."

Rep. Eric Pettigrew, D-Seattle, who sponsored a previous Sonics arena-tax proposal, said backers are trying to dodge pitfalls of previous bills.

"They're definitely more savvy. They're definitely going at it with a lessons-learned approach," Pettigrew said.

In addition to the offer of private money, backers of the latest plan have quietly briefed critics of past arena plans to try to win their endorsement.

Licata, the Seattle city councilmember who drew the ire of Sonics fans a couple of years ago when he told Sports Illustrated the team's departure would have little impact on Seattle, said the latest proposal is headed in the right direction.

"Their intentions are good if they're looking to keep public contributions to a minimum and then maximizing private contributions, which is more than anybody else has mentioned," Licata said.

In 2006, Schultz's ownership group offered $18 million toward a proposed $220 million KeyArena expansion. Bennett last year offered $100 million toward a $500 million arena he wanted to build in Renton.

Van Dyk, the anti-stadium activist, said he thinks the latest proposal could be a good deal for taxpayers.

Van Dyk said he's been briefed on the plan and thinks it would meet the requirements of Initiative 91, approved by Seattle voters two years ago. The measure requires any arena subsidies for pro sports teams to turn a profit for the public.

Van Dyk suggested the arena plan may not even require a public vote.

"If it meets the terms of I-91, as far as I'm concerned, the public has already had its say-so," Van Dyk said.

But another powerful critic of pro sports subsidies, the Services Employees International Union (SEIU), is withholding judgment.

"We continue to be highly skeptical of any plan which takes scarce public resources and uses them primarily for the benefit of a for-profit, private sports team," said David Rolfe, president of SEIU Local 775.

But Rolfe said his union could come around if the proposal is broadened to include public benefits such as low-income housing or health care.

Seattle Times staff reporter Sharon Pian Chan contributed to this report. Jim Brunner: 206-515-5628 or [email protected]. Ralph Thomas: 360-943-9882 or [email protected]

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,283
113
#2
Native son has plan to save Sonics, KeyArena
Developer Griffin offers to fund half of $300 million makeover
By GREG JOHNS
P-I REPORTER

Matt Griffin grew up in South Seattle and played youth football in the Rainier Valley. His dad is a Franklin High graduate. The younger Griffin attended Lakeside, class of '69, before heading off to Princeton.

He's as true a native son as you'll find in Seattle, a man so committed to the city that he and his wife live downtown on Fourth Avenue and don't own a car between them, choosing to walk, bike or ride the bus wherever they go.

So when the Seattle developer says he wants to help provide solutions for KeyArena and the Sonics, you know where his heart lies.

His message to the NBA, being delivered with the developing news of his investment group's interest in salvaging such a disrupted situation?

"You don't have to run away from Seattle," Griffin said. "We have a plan."

Whether there is time and political will in the region to put the plan in place figures to be the $300 million question.

NBA commissioner David Stern blew more rhetoric Seattle's way in a Monday night interview with a pair of Portland television reporters, leaving little doubt he's beyond looking for solutions other than paving the way to Oklahoma City for Clay Bennett's ownership group.

Stern again blamed city and state politicians for failing to come up with an arena solution in time to save the Sonics.

"I have no problem with that choice," Stern told KATU and KGW reporters. "But don't say the NBA is moving out. We understand the push theory and we've been pushed out."

But Stern apparently isn't listening to the latest push, which Griffin admits is aimed at letting NBA owners know Seattle does have serious interest in keeping the Sonics before the league's Board of Governors votes on Bennett's request to relocate the franchise in Oklahoma City at its April 17-18 meeting.

If the city wins its pending lawsuit against the Sonics and holds the team to its KeyArena lease through 2010, that would buy more time to convince NBA owners that Seattle has a viable arena in a much larger market than Oklahoma City.

Griffin's group of business partners has asked to remain anonymous to this point, with the exception of Costco CEO Jim Sinegal. But sources indicate some serious Seattle money is waiting in the wings to see if their offer of funding half of a $300 million KeyArena makeover will garner support from city and state politicians who'd be asked to split the remaining $150 million.

Griffin said the plan would be to keep the existing KeyArena roofline and seating structure largely intact, but expand the size of the building significantly.

The public portion of the funding would go toward infrastructure improvements such as a new underground parking lot to the south, improved sound systems for concerts, better loading docks and necessary seismic work. The private contributions, Griffin said, would be earmarked for specific benefits to the primary tenants, such as improved amenities for premium-seat fans in the lower bowl, restaurants and things that would provide better revenue streams.

As one of Seattle's leading developers, he sees this as a win-win for the city and its residents.

"If KeyArena loses its major tenant and the region is sitting here three years from now trying to figure out how to rejuvenate this place, the city is going to spend a lot of that money anyway," Griffin said. "It's a lot tougher to fix something after it's gone off the edge.

"The Center isn't as vivacious as we'd like it to be, but don't pull one of the legs out from under the stool just when you're trying to amp it up."

City Councilman Tom Rasmussen, who chairs the Parks and Seattle Center committees, said it would be a benefit to have private help with funding a KeyArena remodel as the city moves forward with a major Seattle Center renovation.

"We have a number of important elements to the Center plan," Rasmussen said. "One is KeyArena, but there's also Memorial Stadium and the Center House. I've seen estimates from $180 million-$200 million to renovate Center House. The stadium isn't inexpensive either. So $75 million for KeyArena, in comparison, would be one of the lower costs."

Mayor Greg Nickels is leading the late charge in Olympia, trying to drum up support for a measure that would provide a matching $75 million from the Legislature by extending the same hotel-motel and car rental taxes currently paying off Qwest and Safeco fields.

That effort isn't generating much momentum, given the late start in a session that ends next Thursday, but there are backroom discussions under way and Griffin remains hopeful.

Pearse Edwards, a spokesman for Gov. Chris Gregoire, said the governor is coordinating with Seattle and King County officials in an attempt to get movement on the Sonics' legislation, but nothing definitive has been worked out.

"It's a massive project to renovate KeyArena," Griffin said. "But only one small piece needs to be done in Olympia and that's the request for $75 million of funding through some future taxes. ... We've really been partners with the city on that. The city is leading the effort in Olympia and we're trying to be helpful."

Who exactly the "we" is remains a mystery that Griffin said will be undone if the idea generates sufficient interest.

"There'll be a time for that, it's just not yet," he said. "These are people with other jobs and lives to lead.

"Being a Sonics owner isn't their objective in life. But knowing we have to save the team and fix Seattle Center is important to them."

If Bennett chooses not to sell the team, a KeyArena remodel could serve to draw a future franchise to Seattle.

The New Orleans Hornets, struggling to survive in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, could be looking for a new home in two years if the team fails to meet an attendance standard that would allow owner George Shinn to break his lease.

Stern said in November that if the Sonics departed, Seattle would be "very unlikely" to get another team. He softened slightly Monday, but made clear his unhappiness over the pending court battle and the city's intention to hold Bennett's group to its lease through 2010.

"I never say never," Stern said of a potential replacement team. "I'm only focusing on the reality of the current situation. And we'll see what happens down the road.

"If the expressed desire to bleed current ownership for three more years is acted upon, then we'll take the bleeding with them and the chances of there ever being a franchise in Seattle again are not very good."
 
Jun 27, 2005
5,207
0
0
#6
That would be sweet...but i doubt ti would happen. I am just happy that some local investors are FINALLY showing interest in the only team that has ever brought this city a pro championship.

Yeah thats a start. I remember a few years ago it looked like the Blazers were gonna leave, but then Paul Allen finally sucked it up and bought the Rose Garden back and made shit happen to make the team profitable again. I dont get why owners always want a brand new god damn arena anyway. It seems like Key Arena isnt much older than the Rose Garden. As long as you can get about 20k fans in there and sell em a bunch of merchandise and greasy food, who gives a fuck how old the building is?