Chiefs Vs. Raiders Week

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
JLMACN

JLMACN

JLMACN
#1
Aug 26, 2002
14,639
826
0
44
WWW.YABITCHDONEME.COM
#1
Raider have a new QB. They owned my Chiefs the last time we played in December. My Chiefs have looked respectable in the last 2 games. I am hoping they step their game up and score enough points to win or atleast be respectable.

Let's go with Chiefs

20-17

Of course I'm going with the Chiefs.

5000
 
killahoe666

killahoe666

Sicc OG
#2
May 3, 2002
5,065
859
113
46
#2
Your Chiefs have bounced back a little bit, but then again look who they played, a winless Vikings and winless Colts and barely squeaked those ones out. It doesn't matter this is still a rival and we should not take the Chiefs lightly at all because they would love more than anything to beat us right now, but not in Oakland!!!

Raiders 31-Chiefs 11
 
T-Rip

T-Rip

T Camp
#6
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
44
#6
^^^ Thats cuz your a Raider hater. DUH. Raiders smash, making all you bitter weirdos upset once again
 
Cut-Throat

Cut-Throat

Bob Pimp MOBBEN!!!
#9
Apr 25, 2002
7,033
29,863
0
44
#9
if the the chiefs can somewhat contain Mcfadden they have a chance, startin palmer this early could backfire. should have gave him this week and the bye week to get familiar with the terminology and get on the same page with the recievers....
 
T-Rip

T-Rip

T Camp
#11
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
44
#11
Chree, yeah its not like they had to throw a backup qb in the 2nd quarter or anything lol. Your feelings are based on being biased. DFresh knows whats up
 
Chree

Chree

Medicated
#12
Dec 7, 2005
32,404
13,935
113
40
#12
T-Rip said:
Chree, yeah its not like they had to throw a backup qb in the 2nd quarter or anything lol. Your feelings are based on being biased. DFresh knows whats up
Click to expand...
but they starting a qb that hasnt even played a snap this year..... thats gonna be on the team for 5 days before starting, at least boller knew the system and has been there.....
 
DFresh77

DFresh77

Sicc OG
#13
Dec 4, 2006
17,451
7,543
113
48
#13
Chree, it's not about the QB ...

the Chiefs barely been getting by with their W's ..

Let me put it like this though..

The Raiders D it's not bad, they can put a stop to a weak Chiefs offense..

Chiefs D vs the running game it's not really on point, I expect DMF to run the ball over 120+ yards...
 
radiostationrep

radiostationrep

Sicc OG
#15
Dec 2, 2006
6,161
44
0
#15
Palmer will throw for 300+ and let the nation know what we got. McFadden will get his 100+ yards and peope are going to start believing in the Raiders like I have since pre season.

Raiders 34 Queefs 17
 
P

PsyDaL

Sicc OG
#16
Apr 25, 2002
2,613
4
0
48
#16
Id rather start Palmer than boller 9/10 times. Granted that he wasnt practicing at full speed but hes been active with trainers and few nfl receivers that spoke nothing but good words about his conditioning. His arm is healed to throw them deep, we dont need him to make plays on the ground, as long as he has some kind of mobility just in case for a lil quick playaction or if the pocket collapses. As a great of coach hue jackson is, he'll call plays that palmer could relate too and get it off quick. A deterent of putting him in is he needs time with our wr's, enough time to all be on the same page. Our rush defense is improving every week and i think letting our secondary unit get healthy has shown some signs that they'll be able to continue with their success. I see boss having a huge game this week. I think if we put palmer in there thats gonna be his safe pass knowing hes a big target going up the middle, the kind of success we had when zach miller was with us.

27-16 Raiders. I like how our bye weeks been landing close to mid season these last two yrs....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom