Bill O'Reily At His Finest

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 7, 2005
13,696
161
63
53
www.myspace.com
#2
this kid has o'reilly flustered.

the kid came with FACTS and your boy bill kept givin' his opinion. he goes on to apologize to his viewers for the kids remarks ONLY because they don't mirror his. oreilly is a fuckin' JOKE. completely out of touch with the everyday people of this country.

fuck him and fuck bush

peace


this is what you should be watchin'

http://www.youtube.com/w/The-Fourth-Branch?v=NLsG4fgamTg&search=immortal technique
 
Apr 26, 2002
3,896
638
113
#3
"i'm not gonna discuss world politics with you"

u notice the last half of tha whole segment, bill wouldn't let dude speak. he didn't kno dude wuz so educated in tha history of tha 9-11 situation and that dude would come with straight FACTS. so he (bill) knew dude would bacc him into a corner so what happens when most folks gettin bacced in tha corner? they start swingin wildly. that's wut bill wuz doin, tellin him to shut up, and he hopes his moms aint lookin. fucc bill oreilly, talkin bout, "u r mouthing a far left position", that's all oreilly represents is tha far RIGHT. he's jus very talented in "sugarcoating" his shit. i think i woulda reached across and slapped tha blue out of his eyes tha minute he told me to shut up. really doe. fold.
 
Apr 7, 2005
13,696
161
63
53
www.myspace.com
#5
from what I could gather from the interview, the kids dad was an officer with the port authority, who died in one of the buildings.

I don't know if bill actually knew the dude's dad or was just speaking in general.

I don't know about y'all, but if someone I didn't know was telling me to "shut up", and "your dad would be ashamed of you"...just to peove HIS point, I would have been the first one to knock someone out on CNN.
 
Apr 26, 2002
3,896
638
113
#9
Dirty Shoez said:
Awwww, wooks wike we got a widdo bit of huwt feewings awound hewe! Don't cwy!
naw, it looks like bill o'whiney has a little bit of hurt feelins- on his own show, thats y he gets over defensive. fold.
 
May 29, 2002
4,310
3
0
42
#10
o'reilly was undoubtedly out of line, but the kid viewpoints and opinions werent exactly educated. I mean the fact that our government trained al qaeda does not mean we should back off and let the do what they want. We trained them for something completely different. his reasoning is faulty and makes no sense. I'm sure i would react similarly to someone coming with bullshit like that
 
Dec 14, 2005
78
0
0
39
#11
bayGIANTS said:
o'reilly was undoubtedly out of line, but the kid viewpoints and opinions werent exactly educated. I mean the fact that our government trained al qaeda does not mean we should back off and let the do what they want. We trained them for something completely different. his reasoning is faulty and makes no sense. I'm sure i would react similarly to someone coming with bullshit like that
I don't think the boy is necessarily saying we should back off....he seemed to mainly be defending the fact that the United States shouldn't make rash decisions, and that even the victims aren't urging quick and uncontemplated action.
 

Ne Obliviscaris

RIP Cut-Throat and SoCo
Dec 30, 2004
4,161
20,236
0
47
#13
^^^ dudes point was that america did more to train the cats who flew the jets on 911 than the taliban did, and hes completely correct. think of all the resources we poured into afganistan while the mujahadiin were fighting the russians. the taliban didnt have much to givve al queda, which is made up primarily (or it was in the past generation of fighters) of ex-mujahadiin. america is much more responsible for the material suppor of al queda than the taliban ever were. and as far as what we trained them for, we trained them to fight against democratic governments in order to forward the development of an islamiic state. we had ulterior motives (reducing russian influence) but are you so surprised, they would broaden thier sights beyond the borders of afghanistan?

now if you want to equate al queda with the taliban (which can be argued) thats fine, but in that case they're both product of american intervention into things that are NONE OF OUR FUCKING BUISNESS. initially all this did was fuck with afghanis, whcih no one gave a shit about, then when they blew up the towers it fucked americans, whcih we do give a shit about. im not excusing or defending the cats that blow shit up, but we gave them the means to do so knowing their intentions were to fuck up non islamic societies, to be surprised when they do so.
 
Apr 7, 2005
13,696
161
63
53
www.myspace.com
#16
PGBD said:
O'reilly is a sav. Malkin is a beast. Elevate your political game.
are you fuckin' kidding me???

you're fuckin' brainwashed. the type of dude that has flags and ribbons on his car, huh? those troops you support could be doing more good at home then dying for satan abroad.

Just think how differently the Katrina situation would have been handled, if we had national guard troops in Louisiana, Texas, and Mississippi helping save OUR people, instead of losing their lives in the Middle East. The national guard was QUICK FAST to arrive in NY after 911....why? because NY makes the money, and the govt. must protect it's interests there. The south dont' mean shit to the Govt. and they proved that by handling the situation the way that they did. NY would have NEVER been left without water or electricity. Hundreds of thousands of people in the south are still homeless because of this. Services and help are slow coming. I'm ashamed of the government and their actions.
 

PGBD

Sicc OG
Nov 10, 2004
988
2
0
46
#17
BETO916 said:
Just think how differently the Katrina situation would have been handled, if we had national guard troops in Louisiana, Texas, and Mississippi helping save OUR people, instead of losing their lives in the Middle East. The national guard was QUICK FAST to arrive in NY after 911....why? because NY makes the money, and the govt. must protect it's interests there. The south dont' mean shit to the Govt. and they proved that by handling the situation the way that they did. NY would have NEVER been left without water or electricity. Hundreds of thousands of people in the south are still homeless because of this. Services and help are slow coming. I'm ashamed of the government and their actions.
OK?
You're way off base with all of that and what does this have to do with O'reilly being a savage debater and Malkin being an intellectual beast.
 

PGBD

Sicc OG
Nov 10, 2004
988
2
0
46
#19
I didn't see the clip, but I doubt that a kid could break him down. If anything, the kid was probably using some roundabout, illogical reasoning which is difficult to counter and gives the onlooker the impression that he/she is winning the debate.
 
May 29, 2002
4,310
3
0
42
#20
SoundSquaredRap said:
I don't think the boy is necessarily saying we should back off....he seemed to mainly be defending the fact that the United States shouldn't make rash decisions, and that even the victims aren't urging quick and uncontemplated action.
but still, we trained them with the intenetions of good, the taliban knowingly contributed to the training for terrorism. its like apples and oranges.