bbc admitting they are biased? wtf?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
116
#1
BBC network admits it: We're biased toward left
Acknowledges failure to offer debate due to inherent liberal culture of staff
Posted: June 17, 2007
10:50 p.m. Eastern


© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com


The BBC, the British Broadcasting Corporation, has acknowledged the network is biased toward the left, following a report commissioned by the company.

A yearlong probe revealed the corporation especially partial in its treatment of single-issue politics such as climate change, poverty, race and religion, according to the London Times.

"It concludes that the bias has extended across drama, comedy and entertainment, with the corporation pandering to politically motivated celebrities and trendy causes," the paper said.

The report cites the danger of BBC programs being undermined by the liberal culture of its staff, who need to challenge their own assumptions more.

"There is a tendency to 'group think' with too many staff inhabiting a shared space and comfort zone," says the report.

It notes staff tend to mimic each other's common left-leaning values.


A seminar on staff impartiality held last year is documented, with officials admitting they would broadcast images of the Bible being thrown away, but not the Koran for fear of offending Muslims.

The report also warns that celebrities must not be pandered to and allowed to hijack the BBC schedule, according to the London Telegraph.

It also offers 12 new principles for the corporation to adopt to safeguard objectivity, including:

"Impartiality is no excuse for insipid programming. It allows room for fair-minded, evidence-based judgments by senior journalists and documentary-makers, and for controversial, passionate and polemical arguments by contributors and writers."

A BBC spokeswoman said: "This report is about looking forward and how we are going to face the challenges of impartiality in the modern world."

As WND reported in October, an internal BBC memo revealed senior figures admitted the national news agency was guilty of promoting left-wing views and anti-Christian sentiment.

The admissions of bias were made at the impartiality summit. Most executives admitted the corporation's representation of homosexuals and ethnic minorities was unbalanced and disproportionate.
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
116
#5
Jesse fuckin' Rice said:
I dont see the problem...as the other 99% of media outlets are geared towards the right.
i dont know about all that. maybe your definition of "the right" is anyone right of stalin, in that case maybe so, but i didnt post this to start a foxnews is the antichrist debate.
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#6
Maybe the point is self criticism. How could one eliminate bias without first admitting there is any bias?

People who look to the media for balanced coverage should be happy.

Could we in the U.S. ever expect this kind of soul searching from a domestic media outlet?
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
116
#7
ColdBlooded said:
Maybe the point is self criticism. How could one eliminate bias without first admitting there is any bias?

People who look to the media for balanced coverage should be happy.

Could we in the U.S. ever expect this kind of soul searching from a domestic media outlet?
if its not paris hilton, barry bonds, or alec baldwins brat daughter nobody gives a shit
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,283
113
#8
phil said:
i dont know about all that. maybe your definition of "the right" is anyone right of stalin, in that case maybe so, but i didnt post this to start a foxnews is the antichrist debate.
Never said you did...i simply posting my opinion on the situation. And in some light...FACTS.
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
116
#10
JLMACN said:
Bush owns some of FOx doesnt he?

5000
might as well. i think 20sixxes sig pretty much sums up fox news. i used to be a big fan of them and oreilly until the ludacris fiasco. theyre just as bad as the other networks. i used to confuse "fair and balanced" with "balancing out the unfairness of other networks with our own brand of outlandish one sidedness" that fox spewed