2014 Chevrolet SS

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

DuceTheTruth

No Flexxin No Fakin
Apr 1, 2003
6,884
6,016
1
45
#1


2014 Chevrolet SS

A classic formula, thoroughly modernized.

December 2013
BY DON SHERMAN
MULTIPLE PHOTOGRAPHERS

Highs and Lows


Highs:

Balanced chassis, nicely finished inside and out, bombastic LS3 V-8.


Lows:

No stick shift offered, limited availability.


TESTED

Now that the government’s stake in GM is below five percent, the automaker is launching new models with giddy abandon. That’s especially true at Chevrolet, where the lineup runs from the vest-pocket Spark to the garage-busting Suburban with a generous helping of performance models in the meaty middle.


The newest bow-tie brawler, Chevy’s SS, is a classic V-8, rear-drive performance model for enthusiasts needing more doors, seat space, and trunk room than offered by the Camaro and Corvette. Built in Australia and based on similar underpinnings used for the GM’s previous thunder from Down Under, the beloved Pontiac G8, the SS is convincing evidence that bailing GM out of its 2009 bankruptcy was a shrewd move.


Like the architecturally similar Camaro, the SS has unibody construction supported by front struts and a multilink rear suspension. The SS’s 114.8-inch wheelbase is 2.5 inches longer than the Camaro’s and 3.7 inches shorter than that of the Caprice PPV cop cruiser. Thanks to reasonably tidy overhangs, a reverse-kinked quarter-window, and impressive design restraint, Chevy’s performance flagship convincingly mimics the BMW 5-series Pontiac targeted with the G8 just before that brand slipped into the abyss.


In sync with the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series in which SS-badged sleds compete, there’s a V-8 under the hood that borders on bawdy. It burbles at idle, howls to its 6000-rpm redline, and revs to its 6600-rpm fuel cutoff in spite of the pushrods that operate two large valves per cylinder. Because the SS is powered by an LS3 V-8 instead of the Corvette’s new LT1 engine, GM’s newer technologies—variable cam timing, direct fuel injection, and cylinder shutdown—don’t live here. As a result, the EPA brands the SS a gas guzzler and adds a $1300 tax to the $44,470 window sticker.


Actually, that’s a modest stipend considering the acceleration packed into this family hauler. Thanks to its relatively svelte 3931-pound curb weight, sticky Bridgestone Potenza RE050A tires, and easy-to-launch six-speed automatic transmission, the 415-hp SS sprints to 60 mph in 4.5 seconds and through the quarter-mile in 12.9 seconds at 111 mph. That’s comparable to the times of the quickest stick-shift Camaros we’ve tested and only half a second or so behind the illustrious C7 Corvette. It would be interesting to see if a manual transmission might help the SS’s drag-race potential, but that alternative is not a part of this low-volume program.


Take solace in the knowledge that the SS handles like a Camaro on pain meds. The Bridgestones hug the earth to the tune of 0.95 g, body roll is nicely restrained, and there’s just a touch of understeer at the adhesion limit. Thanks to dampers that might have been pilfered from a BMW factory, the SS never falls apart over imperfect pavement. It jogs with a supple stride and, except for tread noise over patches and expansion joints, is a model of refined comportment. The body structure is solid and rattle-free, and the electrically assisted power steering is calibrated for quick turn-in and a linear rise in effort. The 153-foot fade-free stopping distance from 70 mph is only two-thirds of a car length greater than the best C7 Corvette performance we’ve measured.


In past Chevrolet instances, as soon as the focus shifted from go, stop, and turn, our enthusiasm often faded. The SS is an exception to that rule. The heated and ventilated front seats are appropriately bolstered to combine ample grip with a thorough range of rake and backrest adjustment. There’s a proper dead pedal, and the plastic shift paddles are ribbed for a satisfying feel. The mix of perforated leather, gray suede, red stitching, and minimal hard plastics wouldn’t be uncouth in a Cadillac. The polished-aluminum center stack and steering-wheel accents are the only touches that strike us as over the top. Also, it’s a pity the SS missed out on the rising touch screen that reveals a secret storage cubby in some other Chevy sedans.


The Chevy MyLink center stack includes an eight-inch touch screen, OnStar communications, navigation, Bluetooth connectivity, a USB port, satellite radio, and a nine-speaker Bose sound system as standard fare. A handy head-up display shows engine rpm, car speed, compass heading, lateral acceleration, or ambient temperature. This is the first bow-tie model to provide automatic parking assist. The list of safety gear includes a backup camera; front, rear, and side traffic alerts; and lane-departure warning. Brembo fixed-caliper front brakes, coolers for the engine and transmission, forged aluminum wheels, and a limited-slip differential are also standard.



The Chevy SS seals the deal with a real back seat that two adults or three children can use without whining. The center portion of the backrest folds to haul lumber and pipe purchases back to the ranch from home-improvement stores.



A few thousand SSs will neither make nor break GM or Chevrolet, but considering its amiable, well-rounded personality, we’re glad the General went to the bother of importing this sports sedan. If we’re really lucky, there will someday be a successor with an LT1 and a manual transmission.




[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9F9HQ8Nvwcs[/video]​


.
..
...
....
.....
......
.......
........
.........
..........
...........
............
.............
..............
...............
............................................
............................................
............................................


[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6xRLwiKgt8[/video]​
 
May 7, 2013
13,351
16,249
113
33°
www.hoescantstopme.biz
#5
44k tho for a piece of shit car from a company that used govt bailout money to repay govt bailout money smh

GM announced Wednesday (April 2010) that it had paid back the $8.1 billion in loans it received from the U.S. and Canadian governments. Of that, $6.7 billion went to the U.S. treasury.

But Grassley said in his letter that a Securities and Exchange Commission form filed by GM showed that $6.7 billion of the tens of billions the company received was sitting in an escrow account and available to be used for repayment. He called on Geithner to provide more information about why the company was allowed to use bailout money to repay bailout money, and how much of the remaining escrow money GM would be allowed to keep.

“The bottom line seems to be that the TARP loans were ‘repaid’ with other TARP funds in a Treasury escrow account. The TARP loans were not repaid from money GM is earning selling cars, as GM and the administration have claimed in their speeches, press releases and television commercials,” he wrote.
Thanks GM for exploiting the taxpayers, ripping us off in the stock market, and FUQ U FOREVER
 

S.SAVAGE

SICCNESS MOTHERFUCKER
Oct 25, 2011
7,638
88,991
0
112
EAST SAN JOSE
#6
44k tho for a piece of shit car from a company that used govt bailout money to repay govt bailout money smh



Thanks GM for exploiting the taxpayers, ripping us off in the stock market, and FUQ U FOREVER
bro...


breh...


brah.


....who fucking cares?

We are talking about how this car looks / performs.

Aint nobody give a shit in this thread about government bail outs & shit, take that bullshit to the tinfoil hat forum HERE: Gathering of Minds - The Siccness Network
 
May 7, 2013
13,351
16,249
113
33°
www.hoescantstopme.biz
#7
bro...


breh...


brah.


....who fucking cares?

We are talking about how this car looks / performs.

Aint nobody give a shit in this thread about government bail outs & shit, take that bullshit to the tinfoil hat forum HERE: Gathering of Minds - The Siccness Network
word my bad the word Chevy makes me irate

back to what I said in my prev post 44k for a shitty car is ridiculous

the V8 & RWD is the only positive, not for 44k tho
 
Last edited: