Judgement

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Coach E. No

Coach E. No

Jesus es Numero Uno
#161
Mar 30, 2013
4,191
7,800
113
#161
2-0-Sixx said:
When mass amounts of society, refuses to accept scientific proven facts or theories, such as evolution, simply because it conflicts with their religious beliefs that directly effects intellectual growth, period.
Click to expand...
This is a long topic in itself and by no means am I qualified to argue anything related to science but this is a serious question... If we as man evolved from a lesser form such as an ape, why are there still apes roaming the earth? If that's also the case, is there a projection to be some form of super human evolving thousands of years into the future? Monkeys/apes or whatever the heck it is they are saying we evolved from are way stronger than humans for their size. Does the evolution of the mind and body not include physical strength? Will humans basically all be Stephen Hawking a million years from now at this rate?

At this rate, humans appear to be getting dumber. We appear more likely to look like the movie idiocracy 1000 years from now than evolving into something more intelligent or better.
 
Coach E. No

Coach E. No

Jesus es Numero Uno
#162
Mar 30, 2013
4,191
7,800
113
#162
S.SAVAGE said:
my bad, correction: 150 million years ago

Rare Dinosaur Find: Abandoned Nests with Eggshells
Click to expand...
I could research this but honestly don't care enough. How the hell do they determine something is 150,000,000 years old?


In regards to dinosaurs, there are a grip of Christian people/scientists that believe the dinosaurs did exist at one time but died in the flood during the Noah's Ark stage. I can't remember where I'd read it years ago to be honest but haven't there been dinosaur fossils fused into the sides of hills, mountains, and cliffs? Also there are theories that a flood would dramatically increase the aging process. If I'm not mistaken, it doesn't say how long the flood lasted, only that it rained for 40 days and nights. Anyone who has worked near salt water knows how quickly things deteriorate near the ocean. I would imagine that would be true for any artifact of any kind were it subjected to a flood.

Furthermore, Job 40 alludes to a giant animal of some sort called a Behemoth in the Bible which sounds like a dinosaur by the description. There is also mention of the leviathan which sounds a lot like a dragon in Revelations.
 
Props: S.SAVAGE
Mac Jesus

Mac Jesus

Girls send me your nudes
#168
May 31, 2003
10,752
54,026
113
40
#168
diggidy405 said:
I could research this but honestly don't care enough. How the hell do they determine something is 150,000,000 years old?


In regards to dinosaurs, there are a grip of Christian people/scientists that believe the dinosaurs did exist at one time but died in the flood during the Noah's Ark stage. I can't remember where I'd read it years ago to be honest but haven't there been dinosaur fossils fused into the sides of hills, mountains, and cliffs? Also there are theories that a flood would dramatically increase the aging process. If I'm not mistaken, it doesn't say how long the flood lasted, only that it rained for 40 days and nights. Anyone who has worked near salt water knows how quickly things deteriorate near the ocean. I would imagine that would be true for any artifact of any kind were it subjected to a flood.

Furthermore, Job 40 alludes to a giant animal of some sort called a Behemoth in the Bible which sounds like a dinosaur by the description. There is also mention of the leviathan which sounds a lot like a dragon in Revelations.
Click to expand...
Argon Argon dating, I think. There are a number of different dating methods that can be used. There is also radiocarbon dating which I am more familiar with since I am an archaeologist. However, radiocarbon dating does not date far back enough to determine the age of dinosaurs because the half life of radiocarbon doesn't go back that far. But radiocarbon dating can show us that humans populated the earth is for a much longer period then 6,000 years.
 
Props: Coach E. No
Mac Jesus

Mac Jesus

Girls send me your nudes
#169
May 31, 2003
10,752
54,026
113
40
#169
Scratch that argon argon dating does not go back that far. they use radiometric dating. argon argon would be used for things like humans earliest ancestors.
 
Coach E. No

Coach E. No

Jesus es Numero Uno
#170
Mar 30, 2013
4,191
7,800
113
#170
After reading through some of the Bible today and whatnot, I guess the 6000 year thing comes from the meticulous genealogy records that the Jewish people have kept. Roughly 2000 years ago Jesus was alive and I guess they estimate that their records before that go to roughly 4000 more years or so. Something to that effect.
 
Mac Jesus

Mac Jesus

Girls send me your nudes
#171
May 31, 2003
10,752
54,026
113
40
#171
Yeeaaah. That's right. The 6,000 year thing isn't directly stated in the bible. However, the information in the bible points to the earth being roughly 6,000 years old based off the geneaology from Adam to Jesus. So you got some extreme Christians who will not budge on that issue.

I've had conversations with christians who find out I am an archaeologist and they say what's the oldest site you've ever worked at. I tell em around 10,000 years old and they go off about how that's not possible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom