Bill is attacking SF as a moral authority, he is passing judgement on lifestyle and civic culture. Therefore his character is in play. Whats good for the goose is good for the gander.
Read the smoking gun report. PROOF. HE IS ON TAPE sexuall harassing the woman. PROOF PERIOD. Sex toys and threesomes that he talks about are fetishes and deviant acts if you follow the right wing and the bible closely as he does! I heard the tape when it came out years ago, i dont know if it is still on the net. That gives more credance to his guilt than hers. Does he have her on tape soliciting a pay off? Answer = No. Just him talking sexy time.
Just cuz u paid the bitch off doesnt mean it didnt happen and isnt part of him and his character. Again it is ON TAPE - PROOF. HE IS ON TAPE SAYING IT, HIS WORDS. It is nice that he wanted to fight the acusation, but the station who paid her off didnt. If he really wanted to figh and clear his name he should have. Yet He Didnt. So the cloud is there, let by him. He claims to be a man of conviction yet he did not fight. He hid behind fox news money. That to me proves his GUILT. If i wanted it to be finished forever i would have faught it and let the facts be laid out. People with money always pay off to hide the truth. Especially those on tape speaking greasy.
Which is it reporter or not? News or lies? Anchor man or puff piece provider?you and his followers twist this when it seems necessary. Remeber you said he is not a reporter but an opionist, so again his character is on display as well. Cant have it both ways.
Bill was misleading cuz he did a report,as an authority, and mixed up facts in his own reporting. MISLEADING. i know u quoted what i wrote, but did you read it? also the footage was completely misleading. The reported he hired had footage of maybe 3 districts of the city and then said the whole city is like that. A fallacy and misleading, and certainly not FAIR AND BALANCED. "Prevalant throughout" were the reporters own words. Misleading. Do not sluff this off on the reporter either, this is Bills baby and his show. Bill ordered this report dont be delusional, he has a hard on for SF and sent a "reporter" there. dont blame his peon reporter. Again the show carries his name and the content should be his to own, especially a man with such conviction.
FYI i do watch bill and i read his book as well, the one about looking out for you. I do not disagree with him across the board, but he proports to be a news show on a news chanel and bashed SF with a biased piece. He is open to be bashed and his misleading, shit talking statements should be exposed as well.
Read the smoking gun report. PROOF. HE IS ON TAPE sexuall harassing the woman. PROOF PERIOD. Sex toys and threesomes that he talks about are fetishes and deviant acts if you follow the right wing and the bible closely as he does! I heard the tape when it came out years ago, i dont know if it is still on the net. That gives more credance to his guilt than hers. Does he have her on tape soliciting a pay off? Answer = No. Just him talking sexy time.
Just cuz u paid the bitch off doesnt mean it didnt happen and isnt part of him and his character. Again it is ON TAPE - PROOF. HE IS ON TAPE SAYING IT, HIS WORDS. It is nice that he wanted to fight the acusation, but the station who paid her off didnt. If he really wanted to figh and clear his name he should have. Yet He Didnt. So the cloud is there, let by him. He claims to be a man of conviction yet he did not fight. He hid behind fox news money. That to me proves his GUILT. If i wanted it to be finished forever i would have faught it and let the facts be laid out. People with money always pay off to hide the truth. Especially those on tape speaking greasy.
Which is it reporter or not? News or lies? Anchor man or puff piece provider?you and his followers twist this when it seems necessary. Remeber you said he is not a reporter but an opionist, so again his character is on display as well. Cant have it both ways.
Bill was misleading cuz he did a report,as an authority, and mixed up facts in his own reporting. MISLEADING. i know u quoted what i wrote, but did you read it? also the footage was completely misleading. The reported he hired had footage of maybe 3 districts of the city and then said the whole city is like that. A fallacy and misleading, and certainly not FAIR AND BALANCED. "Prevalant throughout" were the reporters own words. Misleading. Do not sluff this off on the reporter either, this is Bills baby and his show. Bill ordered this report dont be delusional, he has a hard on for SF and sent a "reporter" there. dont blame his peon reporter. Again the show carries his name and the content should be his to own, especially a man with such conviction.
FYI i do watch bill and i read his book as well, the one about looking out for you. I do not disagree with him across the board, but he proports to be a news show on a news chanel and bashed SF with a biased piece. He is open to be bashed and his misleading, shit talking statements should be exposed as well.