I dont know if any of you are Republican..

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Nov 21, 2005
5,793
5
0
41
www.revver.com
#3
Well The only good ones running.. from ALL of them..

are Ron Paul, Kucinich, and Mike Gravel....

everyone else is in the CFR or Bilderberg.. which are part of the North American Union plan, and for one world gov.

Ron Paul is really a libertarion and stands for Freedom.

He is only using the Republican party... to get votes...

but yeah Ron Paul for prez. He's the only one on that stage worth getting anyone's respect.
 
Apr 29, 2006
472
0
0
37
#4
Yeah, I lately have been disgusted with republicans but ron paul is of a different breed altogether. he seems like he just wants to let people live their lives with as little government or big brother influence as possible. if for some reason we have to have a president, then we might as well have one who leaves us alone. plus hes going to end the drug war if elected.
 
Apr 29, 2006
472
0
0
37
#7
The guy is a joke. He has no chance at winning anything, ever.
just because he has no chance at winning anything ever does not make him a joke. pretty much everyone except 2 or 3 people at a time have a chance of becoming president, i guess everyone else is a joke. bush is the only person right now who is not a joke.
 

Psilo707

Complete O.G.
Jun 25, 2002
7,423
62
48
40
Gimcheon, South Korea
www.seoulhunter.com
#11
He's not a joke. He's actually probably the most realistic 'human being' on the entire candidate list, along with Kucinich. This country needs a revolutionary state of mind, and although some of his opinions are a bit extreme for the modern times (like abolishing the IRS - not gonna happen), I could see someone like him being the catalyst for the beginning of a good change during this century.

Anyone besides Giuliani is almost "fine" with me at this point. That man would be twice as bad as GW Bush, easily. Hes the fucking devil, and the downfall of America if he really gets elected.

If nothing else, Paul has charisma and he NEVER contradicts himself. Not one single time, I guarantee it.

I fucking hate conservatives and have never agreed with them. But RP is on a different level, it's not even the same thing with him, despite his "label".
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#12
I don't recall ever seeing so much delusion with a candidate before.

Revolutionary? There is nothing revolutionary about participating in elections.

What is so great about Ron Paul again? Is it his support for Free Trade? Total Free market health care (aka more privatization of the healthcare industry)? School prayer? Private education? Opposing social security? Or his support for a complete federal ban on abortion? His desire to promote "traditional marriage?" The right for government to promote Christianity and get rid of "the separation of Church and State?"

So revolutionary this Ron Paul is!! Sounds more like a typical religious conservative or a Christian Nationalist to me.

The only thing he has going for him is his anti-Iraq war (not terror I remind you, Iraq) stance and he gets brownie points from pot-heads all over Amerika for his stance on marijuana. Other than that, yes, Ron Paul is a joke.
 

Psilo707

Complete O.G.
Jun 25, 2002
7,423
62
48
40
Gimcheon, South Korea
www.seoulhunter.com
#13
Hey, im not saying I think hes the best choice that this country (world) could have, Im simply speaking in relative terms respective to the other candidates, which is what I think people have to do at this point since there won't be any more candidates joining or leaving the upper-levels of the race.

I don't agree with a LOT of his shit, and I should have already stated that. But I think hes more real of a human being than these other fuckheads. Plus hes not a lawyer, oil mogul, or a businessman by trade, which is probably a good thing... don't see too many doctors in office.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#17
If I was going to vote it would probably be for Kucinich. He seems pretty level headed even though I dont like his sketchy face. haha.
Kucinich is a whole different problem. What he's going to do is the exact same thing he did last time - he will tell his supporters that he will never drop out of the race and will fight to the very end. Then, towards the end, he will drop out and tell his supporters to vote for whoever the Democrat candidate is (Obama or Hillary (or both?)), even though he spent his entire campaign bashing them and telling people how bad he/she is.

Why?

Because Kucinich is a fraud and his entire purpose is to appeal to the disenfranchised layer of society and the anti-war crowd and suck them into the democrat party.

So you can say you're going to vote Kucinich but his name wont be on the ballot.
 

Psilo707

Complete O.G.
Jun 25, 2002
7,423
62
48
40
Gimcheon, South Korea
www.seoulhunter.com
#18
I disagree with you there. I would rather see a traditional democrat or republican win then Ron Paul and I am a communist!! Thats how bad I think he would be for amerika.
I can respect that. But if you meant Giuliani > Paul, that's pretty outrageous to me, seeing as Giuliani is the #1 candidate who is pro-war vs. Iran. We would be attacking them very quickly if he got into office, mostly because of his neo-nazi sidekick Podhoretz. I swear those two are the worst possible human beings. And it sucks that Giuliani will 'probably' win... at least it seems that way. Fuck.
 

Psilo707

Complete O.G.
Jun 25, 2002
7,423
62
48
40
Gimcheon, South Korea
www.seoulhunter.com
#19
Kucinich is a whole different problem. What he's going to do is the exact same thing he did last time - he will tell his supporters that he will never drop out of the race and will fight to the very end. Then, towards the end, he will drop out and tell his supporters to vote for whoever the Democrat candidate is, even though he spent his entire campaign bashing them and telling people who bad he is.

Why?

Because Kucinich is a fraud and his entire purpose is to appeal to the disenfranchised layer of society and the anti-war crowd and suck them into the democrat party.

So you can say you're going to vote Kucinich but his name wont be on the ballot.
Youre right, it probably wont be.
Who would you vote for, whether or not you're going to vote?
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#20
I can respect that. But if you meant Giuliani > Paul, that's pretty outrageous to me, seeing as Giuliani is the #1 candidate who is pro-war vs. Iran. We would be attacking them very quickly if he got into office, mostly because of his neo-nazi sidekick Podhoretz. I swear those two are the worst possible human beings. And it sucks that Giuliani will 'probably' win... at least it seems that way. Fuck.
Giuliani is pretty damn bad, no doubt. Fucking cross dresser.

Youre right, it probably wont be.
Who would you vote for, whether or not you're going to vote?
This time around I don't think I'll be voting because I have yet to see a candidate that shares even a few of my views. If I were forced to vote I'd probably vote for a socialist candidate.