Bears refuse to bend to new kickoff rule, told by league to stop mid-game

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

do you like the new kickoff rule?


  • Total voters
    29
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#1
Bears refuse to bend to new kickoff rule, told by league to stop mid-game

By Doug Farrar

Bears refuse to bend to new kickoff rule, told by league to stop mid-game



The Chicago Bears were one of six NFL teams that reportedly voted against the new rule moving kickoffs to the 35-yard line of the team doing the kicking. The rule, which moves the ball up from the 30-yard line and should cause more touchbacks and fewer exciting returns, was implemented by the league's Competition Committee at the owners meetings in March as a move to improve player safety. The thought was that those exciting returns also involve too many high-speed collisions, but the Bears weren't buying it.

In their Saturday preseason opener against the Buffalo Bills at Chicago's Soldier Field, the Bears refused to accept the new rule, and instead lined their first two kickoffs up at their 30, as had been in the past. Apparently, the officials on site didn't catch it, because no penalties were called and it took a call from Vice President of Officiating Carl Johnson(notes) to "put a stop to it," according to the Twitter account of Johnson's predecessor, current Fox Sports analyst Mike Pereira.

Bears head coach Lovie Smith, who's had return teams among the league's best for a number of years, seemed unaffected by the violations and any potential fallout. In other words, it wasn't a mistake.

"[Bears kicker] Robbie Gould(notes) … we can put it on the 35 and he can kick it out each time,'' Smith said. ''We're not really getting a good evaluation of what we can do coverage-wise on some of our players. That's what we were trying to do with it.''

Last year, according to Football Outsiders' metrics, the Bears ranked first in average starting drive position — their average drive began just after their own 33-yard line. The Houston Texans were the worst team in this category; their average drive started just past their own 25-yard line. With almost a first-down's difference between best and worst, and given Chicago's recent history of great return men from Devin Hester(notes) to Danieal Manning(notes) to Johnny Knox(notes) (the picture above shows Knox taking a kick 70 yards in that very same Bills game), you can understand why Smith and the Bears aren't pleased about giving up an advantage they have obviously built their personnel decisions around.

The decision to move the ball up would actually help the Bears' kick coverage teams — FO notes that Chicago ranked 24th in average drive start allowed, allowing opponents to start at about their own 30-yard line. The Atlanta Falcons backed their opponents up to about the 24 on kicks last season, so there's the team that should be upset that the skill element has been taken out of the equation.

The rule seems like an overreaction built to take fun and excitement out of the game, and there have already been fairly serious effects. In the first preseason week alone, according to Paul Domowitch of Philly.com, 43 of 127 kickoffs, or 33.8 percent, were touchbacks. Throughout the 2010 season, the touchback rate was 16.4 percent.

It doesn't take a math major to understand the effect on the game, and why the Bears want to go rogue on this rule. Will they continue to do so, and what might the penalties be?
 
Feb 10, 2009
7,907
8,004
113
South Sacramento
#3
Its less entertaining with the new rule, I hope they realize its not a good thing and change it back next year.

if it aint broke dont fix it, they need to stop makin these outlandish rule changes.

Roger Goodell is a ignorant faggot.
 
Aug 9, 2006
6,298
56
48
35
#9
the new rule is fine, the nfl is going to start protecting their players to protect their check books in the future. i wouldnt be suprised if they do change it back if it dramaticlly reduces KR TDS
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,366
6,556
113
42
#11
new rule is fucken stupid. Gonna be so many damn touchbacks. Getting better field position then the 20 yd line is what a lot of times give an offense momentum to score points on that drive.
 
Jul 25, 2007
4,989
2,060
113
44
#13
It actually happens often...Someone only has a few feet to move before they get smashed by someone thats already sprinting down the field.

I'm just saying, if you have more separation than there is a better chance of breaking free and outmaneuvering people.
And who gives a fuck. Thats all on the Special Teams coach and the special teams players. That rule is fucking stupid and the other teams that voted against it, are haters.

In the words of Ice T during the Players Haters ball, "hate, hate, hate, hate, hate, hate, hate!"

That fucked up the excitement of players that play a major role in dominant special teams. They might as well just make it a "Losers" rule. If the other team scores, just give them the ball at the 40.
 
Nov 1, 2004
2,946
78
48
39
#15
Just watching Seabass kick it through the Field Goal at the game was enough for me. The new rule is fucking stupid. Protecting an investment? They don't give a fuck about the players. They don't want to pay for health care for the players.
NFL just hating on the Raiders and Jacoby Ford/Seabass, business as usual.
 

Rossibreath

triple og from the sbp
Sep 1, 2005
12,968
15,464
113
48
Menasha
#16
Ya dude. They changed the rule because they don't want Jacoby Ford to run back TDs. Lol holy fuck. You guys do know you can run it out of the endzone right? I don't see this being a big problem. Pretty sure they kicked off from the 35 until a few years ago anyway. Maybe that was like 10 years ago, I don't remember I'm old.