I'm not in the music industry, just a consumer of bay shit. I wanted from the board some info about inde artists from the bay. My question is: Are most bay area artists/Ceo's really breaded that they dont have to make a living at a 9-5 or hustle and make illegal flow?
Do making records, collabos, performing, & producing mostly in an inde-regional market foot the bill in making a comfortable living given the bay is in a very high cost of living area and most artists are not signed to a major?
I'm planning on doing a bi-coastal book, or documentry DVD in the future on the economics of being inde-regional instead of a major label signee. I picked the bay because it has a longer more vibrant history, plus, California as a whole is one of the largest economies in the World.
Do making records, collabos, performing, & producing mostly in an inde-regional market foot the bill in making a comfortable living given the bay is in a very high cost of living area and most artists are not signed to a major?
I'm planning on doing a bi-coastal book, or documentry DVD in the future on the economics of being inde-regional instead of a major label signee. I picked the bay because it has a longer more vibrant history, plus, California as a whole is one of the largest economies in the World.