THE TAPES ARE STILL ALIVE! THE PATS ARE FUCKED!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jul 8, 2007
2,671
1
0
37
#1
wow.....

Yahoo.com.com said:
Matt Walsh's lawyer asks NFL to protect his client on Spygate tapes
By DAVE GOLDBERG, AP Football Writer
February 15, 2008

NEW YORK (AP) -- The lawyer for former New England Patriots employee Matt Walsh said his client is willing to turn over videotapes he made for the team if the NFL guarantees Walsh protection from lawsuits or other legal action.


Attorney Michael Levy said that to date, the NFL's initial proposals are not sufficient protection for Walsh, who is said to have taped the St. Louis Rams' walkthrough practice the day before they played the Patriots in the 2002 Super Bowl. The Patriots won 20-17.


"Under our proposal, Mr. Walsh is only protected if he in good faith is truthful. And he will be," Levy told The Associated Press on Friday in a telephone interview from his office at the Washington law firm of McKee Nelson.


"The NFL's proposal is not full indemnification. It is highly conditional and still leaves Mr. Walsh vulnerable. I have asked the NFL to provide Mr. Walsh with the necessary legal protections so that he can come forward with the truth without fear of retaliation and litigation. To best serve the interest of the public and everyone involved, I am hopeful that the NFL will do so promptly."

NFL commissioner Roger Goodell has said he's offered Walsh a deal whereby "he has to tell the truth and he has to return anything he took improperly" in return for indemnity.


"No one wants to talk to Matt Walsh more than we do," NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said Friday.


"But his demand to be released from all responsibility even if his comments are not truthful is unprecedented and unreasonable. The NFL and the Patriots have assured Mr. Walsh's lawyer that there will be no adverse consequences for his client if Mr. Walsh truthfully shares what he knows. Why does he need any more protection than that?"


Walsh, now a golf pro in Maui, did video work for the Patriots when they won the first of their three Super Bowl after the 2001 season.


Goodell said Walsh was not interviewed as part of the NFL's investigation into "Spygate," which involved the NFL confiscating tapes from a Patriots employee who recorded the New York Jets' defensive signals from the sideline during the opening game of the 2007 season.


As a result of that investigation, New England coach Bill Belichick was fined $500,000 and the team was fined $250,000 and forfeited its 2008 first-round draft choice.


Six confiscated tapes and other documents pertaining to the Patriots' taping were subsequently destroyed by the league. Goodell has defended the destruction of the tapes.


Levy, who is continuing to negotiate with the NFL on Walsh's behalf, also objected to NFL security's investigation of his client.


"Sending a former FBI agent to investigate his professional and personal life has not left Mr. Walsh feeling confident that the National Football League simply wants to encourage him to come forward with whatever information he has," Levy said.


Goodell met this week with Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter and disclosed for the first time that the taping may have gone back to 2000, when Belichick first became coach of the Patriots. The commissioner said Belichick told him in their meeting last September that he believed the taping was legal. "We agreed to disagree," the commissioner said.


Specter, the senior Republican on the Senate Judiciary committee, said after the meeting that he would continue to investigate the taping episodes. He has said he also would like to speak with Walsh.


Goodell said he could reopen the investigation.


"If there is new information that is credible, new material that could be credible that would help us, yes, we'll look at it," he said.


But Eric Holder, a partner in Covington & Burling, the NFL's outside law firm, suggested the NFL might remain reluctant to meet Walsh's current terms.


"No responsible investigator would offer blanket immunity to a potential witness without a commitment that the witness will be truthful," Holder said. "Any witness who refuses to make that commitment doesn't deserve immunity."


NFL Football Writer Barry Wilner contributed to this report.
 
Nov 7, 2006
7,383
36
0
40
#2
yeah this guy is weird. i mean the pats said he can do what he wants with any tapes he got and they wont do shit to him and the NFL said if he's 100% truthful then they wont do much but he's doing this? well guess imma have to wait and see lol. this sucks
 
Nov 7, 2006
7,383
36
0
40
#4
^^^not for the fans. hopefully this guy is talkin out his ass and he has nothing new. i'll admit if we taped that walk threw then i offically hate bill belichick and if we did even more then i dunno. the signals is one thing but if he's actually doing that then i dunno what to think of him. still gonna love the players and the team though but i will never consider bill a genius again, specially cause he got caught lol.
 
Nov 7, 2006
7,383
36
0
40
#6
^^^yeah but if a new fine comes out then u know there was something extra. he's explained the other tapes and whats on em so i dont think he's trying to hide anything.
 
Nov 7, 2006
7,383
36
0
40
#9
^^^not really. cause there really aint no sayin what we got from it. i think goodell already said that shit or something but theres no way thay would do that.
 

Defy

Cannabis Connoisseur
Jan 23, 2006
24,139
16,658
0
46
Rich City
#11
I heard he got a tape from january 19th 2002 where belicheck paid a referee off.....gave him some cash and told him to tuck it away in is pocket :paranoid:
 
May 3, 2005
718
2
0
#14
^^^not for the fans. hopefully this guy is talkin out his ass and he has nothing new. i'll admit if we taped that walk threw then i offically hate bill belichick and if we did even more then i dunno. the signals is one thing but if he's actually doing that then i dunno what to think of him. still gonna love the players and the team though but i will never consider bill a genius again, specially cause he got caught lol.
Hey homie u need to take that pic of the pats 3 rings off, yall cheated...
 
Feb 15, 2007
1,623
3
0
#16
if marion jones gets stripped from her olympic medals, why not the cheatriots?

they should strip the cheatriots' lombardi trophies, except for the year they beat the pigeons.
**disclaimer**
i dont give a fuck about this situation, just stating what people will say when people start wanting to taint their shit

one could simply argue that when jones took roids they gave her a DIRECT advantage over the competetion, while on the other hand those tapes didnt make that big of a difference....
 
Jun 15, 2005
4,591
14
0
#17
She was winning medals before that, so we don't know the advantage. We know she cheated, and she got stripped of her medals.

So did her relay teammates who had no control over her cheating.

Just for arguments sake.
 
Nov 7, 2006
7,383
36
0
40
#18
Hey homie u need to take that pic of the pats 3 rings off, yall cheated...
until i see the proof imma kepp em up but if we infact cheated against the rams then i will take em down, and ur a hater anyway Yao Ming so i will not be listening to anything u say on the subject
 
Nov 7, 2006
7,383
36
0
40
#20
^^^nah i already planned it but i'm not gonna say they cheated on the shit until the proof is there because this golf dude is very sketchy about it and even the NFL is thinking it. i find it weird that the pats said he can do what he wants with what he got if it's something that embarrassing. i dunno just happy u like my Yao Ming thingy lol