Boxing News Thread

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
The Year of Pacquiao

By Julian Kasdin

Near the end of every calendar year, boxing fans and pundits a like look back and attempt to determine who was the sport’s top fighter. Sometimes we are faced with the difficult task of dissecting multiple fighters’ accomplishments over the last year to decide who best represented the sport by fulfilling two key criteria. The first being that they challenged themselves against the game’s best, and the second being that they fought on a big enough stage to warrant the attention of the pugilistic world. Without a doubt the fighter of 2009 is Manny Pacquiao, who seared his brand of pugilism on the collective consciousness of the American sporting public with a pair of brilliantly devastating performances against two of boxing’s best.



While 2009 was Pacquiao’s year, the truth is that his latest campaign began in December of 2008. In that month, boxing’s current box office and pound-for-pound king fought the former face of American boxing, Oscar de la Hoya. What followed was an eight round pummeling, that saw the six-division champion beaten from pillar to post by a whirling dervish of fistic energy. Using a combination of exceptional speed, an unpredictable arsenal of punches, and fight-changing power, Pacquaio was able to bruise, batter, and ultimately break de la Hoya. Oscar, who had only been stopped once before by long-time middleweight champion Bernard Hopkins, was now slumped in his corner between rounds and made the decision to call it a career on his stool. With that singular image, a swollen eye, sagging shoulders, and a look of dejection on Oscar’s face, the torch was passed from the ‘Golden Boy,’ to the ‘Pac-man.’

Manny would not disappoint, but he would have to wait. Pacquaio’s historically staunchest rival, Juan Manuel Marquez, would begin 2009 with a bang. After following Manny to lightweight with a win over Joel Casamayor last year, Marquez would take on Juan Diaz in February. The following action packed nine rounds eventually saw Marquez take command and knockout the former lightweight champion. At this point many were making the argument that Marquez should be considered the top pound-for-pound fighter in the sport, supplanting Pacquiao atop boxing’s mythical rankings. Manny, despite having defeated Marquez in 2008, was in need of a win that would erase all doubt as to his place in pugilism.



Enter Ricky Hatton, the once-beaten junior welterweight champion. Hatton, who was defeated by then welterweight champion Mayweather at 147 in 2007, had moved back down to his weight and reeled off two dominating performances against Juan Lazcano (UD 12), and current titleholder Paul Malignaggi (TKO 11), becoming the first man to stop the teak tough Brooklynite. The stage was set as boxing’s two biggest draws would come head-to-head in Las Vegas.



What many thought might have been an exciting clash of styles, ended up becoming one of the most emphatic victories of Pacquiao’s career. From the first bell on it was clear that Hatton did not have the speed, mobility, skill, or power to keep up with his Filipino foe. In the first round, Hatton, who had stood up to the power of Kostya Tszyu, would visit the canvass twice. While Manny controlled the second round, it appeared as if Hatton had found his footing, and would be able to weather the storm. Then it happened, a Pacquiao jab just missed Hatton, who moved towards his left exposing his chin, with perfect timing Manny fired a lightning fast left cross that shattered Ricky’s chin. As Hatton fell to the floor it was clear that the man from Manchester had been separated from his senses thanks to the most spectacular single punch of Pacquiao’s career. With the win Manny claimed his fourth lineal title, and sixth belt in as many weight divisions, but more importantly Pacquiao reaffirmed his standing as the sport’s mythical king.



Without a doubt the rise of Pacquiao, combined with his financial troubles, forced former pound-for-pound kingpin Floyd Mayweather back into the sport. Floyd would secure a fight with Juan Manuel Marquez, the then penultimate fighter in the world, at what was supposed to be a 144 pound catch weight fight. Floyd came in at 146 and proceeded to embarrass the game, but severely undersized Marquez, in a performance that some found impressive but many others found shameful. Still there were those who argued, despite Marquez clearly fighting two-divisions higher than he should have, that this win should automatically install Floyd as the sport’s number one man.

Pacquiao would silence these critics once again with a timeless victory against then reigning WBO welterweight champion Miguel Cotto. The two were to meet at a catch weight of 145 pounds, with Manny now making a second trip to welterweight to fight arguably one of the top three fighters in the division. Cotto, who’s only blemish came against the now tainted Antonio Margarito, had rebounded with two wins, including one against divisional stalwart Joshua Clottey. This fight, unlike the de la Hoya encounter, would see Pacquiao face a fast, powerful, and skilled welterweight in his prime. Once again pundits believed that this fight would be a nip-and-tuck affair, very few could honestly see Manny dismantling such an accomplished fighter.



While the first three rounds seemed to confirm the belief of many that this fight would be close, save for a flash knockdown of Cotto in the third, the fourth round saw Pacquiao take control and never look back. Utilizing his frenetic arsenal of punches, Pacquiao was able to land a crunching uppercut on Cotto’s chin, emphatically planting the Puerto Rican on his back. While Cotto survived the round he would not survive the fight. Increasingly reluctant to engage, Cotto would begin to retreat as Pacquiao surged forward. Finally, in the twelfth round, the referee did what Cotto’s corner could not, and mercifully ended the fight. With the win Pacquiao captured his seventh title in as many weight divisions, and left no doubt that he is not only the fighter of the year, but may very well be one of the greatest fighters of all time.



Next year could be an even bigger year, if a proposed clash with Mayweather does come to fruition. If it does not come to pass that Manny will meet Mayweather, it is without a doubt that the twelve month run from de la Hoya to Cotto is one of the best this sport has seen, and is certainly worthy of all the praise that has been bestowed upon Pacquiao this year. Between the big names, emphatic victories, and far reaching impact he has had on a sport, without a doubt this was the year of Pacquiao.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Conte Weighs In

By Steve Kim

Say what you want about him, but Victor Conte - the man who chemically masterminded the success of various world-class athletes while running BALCO- has a unique perspective on this debate surrounding the ’Olympic-style’ drug testing that the camp of Floyd Mayweather is insisting on prior to them facing Manny Pacquiao. Pacquiao and his camp, are balking at the insistence of drawing blood and the number of times they would be subjected to do so.

Conte believes that blood testing is vital in this instance. But not for the reason everyone thinks.

He emailed Maxboxing,:’In my opinion, blood testing for the Pacquiao-Mayweather fight is more important for detecting possible blood doping or use of EPO than it is for human growth hormone. Measuring hematocrit levels (percentage of red blood cells to total whole blood volume) is very important. For example, even without a positive urine test for EPO, cyclists are temporarily suspended for two weeks if their hematocrit is greater than 50%. An elevated hematocrit can provide a significant advantage to a fighter by enhancing oxygen uptake and utilization. This would benefit a fighter in training and especially during the later rounds of a fight."

Some observers have been suspicious of Pacquiao’s recent dominance as he has moved up in weight. ’the Pac Man’, who won his first world title as a flyweight( 112-pounds), has knocked out the trio of Oscar De La Hoya, Ricky Hatton and, most recently, Miguel Cotto, in succession. Leading some to believe that he is ’juicing’- meaning he is on a form of steroids or HGH( human growth hormone). But Conte believes that a blood test must be adminstered for the reason stated up above in his email.

"One, I think that increasing hematocrit levels, whether it’s by traditional blood-doping or the use of EPO, is of greater benefit to a boxer than the use of growth-hormone," he explained."So growth-hormone is more of an anti-catobolic agent that may help to accelerate the healing of the tissue repair process. But growth-hormone is not anabolic as an anabolic steroid. It’s an anti-catabolic agent and I believe that you don’t get a very big bang for your buck. I’m not a huge fan of growth-hormone. I don’t think it’s tremendously beneficial performance enhancing substance.

"EPO, though, in terms of boxing, is absolutely huge, both in training and as well as in a fight, especially during the later rounds."

Conte does have experience in boxing, having worked with Andre Ward and Eddie Chambers, recently, and back in 2003, during the heyday of BALCO, assisted with Shane Mosley in his usage of illegal P.E.D’s in his rematch with Oscar De La Hoya. When asked if Mosley was on EPO for that fight, Conte answered,"Yes, he was."

Another factor that is essential is that the tests need to be random in nature.

"Otherwise," he explains,"it’s what they call ’announced testing’ and I’ve historically called that ’I.Q. testing’. So to apply that to other sports, it would be like showing up to training camp for Major League Baseball and they test you. That’s announced testing. You have to be pretty dumb to show up at training camp or at ’announced testing’ and test positive. The clearance time of most of these drugs that are out there are well known."

He also says that for these substances to be utilized at their maximum efficiency, they must be properly cycled and be out of your system by the time competition begins.

"Creams, transdurmals, clear the fastest. Orals, would be next. Water-based drugs- including testosterone- would be next, then the oil-based. So some of these can clear in a matter of hours and days," explained Conte."So if you know when you’re going to be tested a week out, you go off the use of oral testosterone, for example, you’re going to test negative. So that is really an issue."

Accoring to him,"Traditional testing in boxing, it’s basically worthless other than the detection of some types of stimulant, before and after a fight."

The Mayweather camp and Golden Boy Promotions, has insisted- against Bob Arum’s wishes- on employing USADA( the United States Anti-Doping Agency) and their methods to monitor both boxers leading into the fight( which is now in serious jeopardy). But USADA’s testing is hardly foolproof, as two of Conte’s most famous clients, Marion Jones and Tim Montgomery, avoided detection for years from this organization.

"There’s lots of loopholes. They call that the ’gold standard testing’. I’ve said this as far back as 2004, that there are huge loopholes that you can drive an equivelant of a Mack Truck through. the USADA testing is certainly better than what is used in professional sports but it’s still relatively easy to beat the test," states Conte, who was also noted for working with baseball slugger Barry Bonds, during his assault on the record book." Now, I don’t know in the case of this fight, but the reason is because you’re allowed two missed tests and they can’t come back the next day because you have to be allowed a hearing to provide your reasonable explanation or the ’exceptional circumstance’ as they call it. So they’ll just come back the next day and of course none of this is transparent. It’s like being up to hit in baseball where you get two strikes and then you smack it out of the park and hit a home run. So it’s still relatively easy to beat USADA testing and in this particular case, I do believe you need to have random, unannounced testing. To just say,’I’ll be tested on this date’, there’s all sorts of things you can do with announced testing, you can’t do with unannounced testing."

DESERT STORM

There was a press release put out on behalf of WBO jr. welterweight champion Tim Bradley and his promoter, Gary Shaw, stating that ’the Desert Storm’ is willing and able to face either man, should Pacquiao-Mayweather not transpire on March 13th.

And Bradley, will not insist on any ’Olympic-style’ testing procedures.

"Absolutely not," he said, laughing at the thought."Everyone knows I’m willing to fight with Manny or Mayweather. I mean, I don’t understand what’s going on with this whole fight issue. I really don’t understand it. It makes no sense to me about all of this drug testing and all of this stuff. The commission handles all of that. They do a great job. Before the fight I take a urine test, they get a urine sample from me. Then after the fight, they take it. After every championship fight they’ve taken urine samples from me. I end up being negative, all the time. Manny Pacquiao doesn’t have a history of using drugs, he’s never used drugs, he’s never been caught with anything. I don’t believe this guy’s using drugs. I just think it’s his time, right now. Mayweather has never tested positive for anything either and he’s done some successful things in his career, also."

In his last outing, Bradley put on a brilliant display of boxing, handing his mandatory challenger, Lamont Peterson, his first professional defeat. He is now looking to take on the sports marquee names.

"As far as facing Manny Pacquiao, we don’t need extra drugs tests, Olympic drug tests or whatever they’re trying to do," said Bradley on Christmas Eve."Man, let’s just do it. Let’s do it, I’m game, I’m ready to go. Everybody in boxing knows I’m ready and game and I’ll fight anybody in the game, anytime, anyplace, anywhere."

X-MAS FLURRIES

Paulie Malignaggi is now being mentioned as the new opponent to face Manny Pacquiao on March 13th. Which is ironic given that Malignaggi made comments a while back insinuating that Pacquiao was using illegal substances....If that’s true, who does Mayweather face next? Perhaps the winner of Mosley-Andre Berto? And if it’s Mosley, will he insist on USADA testing for that one?....I’m just wondering if somewhere out there in Dallas if Jerry Jones is having a good laugh over this....Anyone getting a Red Ryder BB gun for Christmas?.....This weeks edition of ’the Main Event’ had Dan Goossen and Freddie Roach....Questions or comments can be sent to [email protected]/stevemaxboxing...
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Roger Mayweather: Pacquiao-Mayweather is a Sensible Figh

The Mayweathers, for whatever reason, refuse to accept that Manny Pacquiao is one of the greatest boxers in this generation. But at least someone in the Mayweather camp genuinely feels the Pacman is a sensible option for the former pound-for-pound king. Roger Mayweather, along with his clansmen, admitted in an interview that Pacquiao “is a better fighter than I thought he was” after dismantling Oscar dela Hoya and Ricky Hatton.

Roger predicted a Cotto victory and will only believe that Pacquiao is great, or at least should be in line with other greats, if he gets past the Puerto Rican. Well, Pacquiao made Cotto retreat. Will Roger admit that Pacquiao is really great?

That aside, Roger believes that a Pacquiao-Mayweather clash will be the biggest event in boxing and that it should happen sometime next year. With all the blockades set up by the Mayweather camp, it is easy to see that only Roger truly knows the impact of this bout.

“That will be the biggest fight for my nephew,” Roger said.

However, Lil’ Floyd’s father is in to contradict things. With insinuations about steroid use helping the Pacman scale the weights and beat bigger fighters, Floyd Senior is doing more harm than good. And with the suggestion of Olympic standard drug testing, they are only showing that the Mayweathers are not willing to pit Pretty Boy against the Pacman.

And if Pacman does pass the test, then Mayweather has finally ran out of options, except for one as suggested by Roger Mayweather – fight Pacquiao
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Green vs. Hopkins bout in jeopardy – News

By Sean McDaniel: The proposed bout between International Boxing Organization cruiserweight champion Danny Green (28-3, 25 KO’s) and Bernard Hopkins (50-5-1, 32 KO’s) is in jeopardy of not happening due to money issues between the two fighters, according to Boxing Talk. Gary Shaw, the adviser to Green, said to Boxing Talk “Bernard Hopkins said that he wants a 60-40 deal to fight Danny Green. At any rate, I spoke to Danny Green last night. Danny Green absolutely will not give Hopkins a 60-40 deal. When we were at Richard Schaefer’s office over a week ago, we offered up a 50-50 deal and we’ve been waiting to hear the results for a while now.”

Hopefully, a deal can be made to try and salvage this fight. Green, 36, recently stopped Roy Jones Jr. in the 1st round on December 2nd in an impressive knockout victory Hopkins, 44, defeated middleweight contender Enrique Ornelas on the same night in a 12 round decision. The plan was for Hopkins to fight Jones next, but Green’s victory took away any chance of a Jones-Hopkins rematch to take place. The most natural fight for Hopkins at that point was to fight Green, and beat him.

However, Green, a champion, doesn’t want to take a smaller cut so this fight is now in jeopardy of not happening. Hopkins has few appealing options other than a fight with Green. Hopkins could opt to fight light heavyweight Chad Dawson, but that would be a very tough fight for Hopkins at this point in his career. The 6′3″ Dawson would have the speed and size advantage over the 6′1″ Hopkins and it would be asking a lot of Bernard to try and beat a young fighter like that.

Green isn’t much easier, though. He hits hard and puts his punches together in an attacking style of fighting. Hopkins is more of a one punch at a time type fighter at this point in his career. He would have to find a way to slow Green down by clinching a lot if he were to have a hope of beating the Australian slugger. He couldn’t stand and trade with him, because that would be playing into Green’s strength.

In Green’s last fight with Jones, Green stalked Roy around the ring jabbing him hard in the midsection. As soon as Jones backed up to a corner, Green nailed him with a hard right hand that came looping to the side of Jones’ head, knocking him down. After Jones got to his feet, Green landed an avalanche of punches while Jones tried to cover up. Seeing that Jones wasn’t about to throw anything back, the referee stepped in and stopped the bout before Jones could get seriously hurt.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Pacquiao vs. Malignaggi: What a total mismatch

By Chris Williams: With the Floyd Mayweather Jr. vs. Manny Pacquiao fight out the window because the two fighters couldn’t come to an agreement about the drug testing methods, Top Rank promoter, Bob Arum, has said that they’re looking at replacing Mayweather with former IBF light welterweight champion Paulie Malignaggi for the March 13th date at the MGM Grand, in Las Vegas, Nevada. My question is this: Couldn’t the Pacquiao team found a little better opponent than Malignaggi to fight?

I mean, come on. Malignaggi may be a middle of the pack top light welterweight, but there’s got to be at least six to ten other fighters that Pacquiao’s management team could have selected for Pacquiao to fight rather than Malignaggi. I see this as a terrible mismatch at best. I wouldn’t mind seeing the mismatch if it were on ESPN, but this fight is going to be pay-per-view. I don’t know about the rest of you, but I personally don’t want to shell out $49.95 to see Pacquiao take Malignaggi apart over three or four one-sided rounds.

That’s not my idea of entertainment. That’s like throwing a lamb to a hungry lion and expecting the lamb to have a chance. I don’t want to pay to see that. If it’s on free television, yes, I’ll watch it. But to put a non-champion caliber fighter like Malignaggi with what many people see as the best fighter in boxing is like throwing someone to be sacrificed. Malignaggi had his day in the past couple of years.

Malignaggi won the IBF title against a 37-year-old Lovemore N’dou, and the preceded to defend the title twice in two incredibly close and very unimpressive performances against Herman Ngoudjo and N’dou before losing the title to Ricky Hatton in an 11th round knockout loss in November 2008. Before the Hatton, I saw both of Malignaggi’s fights against Ngoudjo and N’dou, and I thought Malignaggi lost both of those fights. He ran around the ring all night long throwing weak shots and getting clobbered by those guys.

I was shocked that Malignaggi got the win. However, the division has improved greatly since that time with the young fighters like Marcos Maidana, Victor Ortiz, Timothy Bradley, Devon Alexander, Lamont Peterson and Kendall Holt moving up. I just don’t see Malignaggi as being in the same class as those fighters and more of a fighter that had his brief moment in the limelight.

If Pacquiao’s team want to put him with a good fighter, they should choose among Maidana, Ortiz, Bradley or Alexander as a n opponent. We’ve already seen mismatches with Pacquiao in his fights with Hatton, De La Hoya and Miguel Cotto, but a fight against Malignaggi would be much worse in my view. The only way I can see this fight lasting any length of time is if Malignaggi has hi s track shoes on and decides to run all night long.

But as far as purchasing the fight and paying my hard earned money to see it, I won’t do it. You got to do much better than this. I don’t mind tune-ups for fighters that need one, but Pacquiao doesn’t need a tune-up bout at this time. And there’s plenty of time to fight a good fighter like Bradley to step in and take Mayweather’s place. Bradley has even said that he’s willing to fight Pacquiao. So what’s the problem? Is Bradley too dangerous?

Malignaggi might be better known than Bradley, which is why he’s probably being considered over the other fighters, but you have to look at the entertainment value. What good is it for boxing fans if Pacquiao goes out and destroys some over matched opponent in three or four rounds? The fight won’t be entertaining in the least as far as I’m concerned, because Malignaggi will be so far out of his class in this fight.

Plus, Malignaggi will probably run as much as he can. That’s his style, isn’t it? He’s kind of a hit and run type fighter. I’d much rather see Pacquiao fight Bradley. At least with him, he’ll go right after Pacquiao and try to beat him up on the inside. Of course, this would be a competitive fight and Pacquiao have a chance of losing it, because Bradley is very good. But at least boxing fans would get their money’s worth in watching it.

I’d pay to see Pacquiao fight Bradley. I won’t pay a dime to see Pacquiao fight Malignaggi. I have better things to do with my money than to spend $49.95 on watching a total mismatch. Again, if the fight is on regular HBO, I’ll watch it, but if it means having to purchase this fight, I won’t even consider doing it.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Pacquiao not interested in taking a simple random Olympic style drug test

By Manuel Perez: As reported elsewhere, Manny Pacquiao isn’t interested in taking the random Olympic style drug tests that Floyd Mayweather’s team has asked for. It seems that if he did take the tests, there might be a problem with them causing problems with his training, especially if the tests come directly before the fight.

His promoter Bob Arum wants to take a different kind of testing. Why? I have no idea. They want the testing to be done at three separate times. Mayweather for good reason doesn’t want this. He wants the test to be random, and I can’t blame him. What good are drug tests if you know when they’re going to occur. That kind of defeats the purpose, doesn’t it?

And to top off this horrible mess, I’m hearing that Paulie Malignaggi is being considered as a replacement opponent for Pacquiao on March 13th. How can Malignaggi be a replacement opponent when he doesn’t even have a title? I suppose Malignaggi is open to fighting Pacquiao without the Olympic style drug tests.

I think this would be a terrible mismatch. Malignaggi isn’t even the best fighter in the light welterweight division. Pacquiao needs to fight Juan Marquez. That’s who he needs to fight if he doesn’t want to take the drug test. I don’t know if Marquez would complain too much about Pacquiao not taking a drug test, because he’s a Mexican warrior and by nature we don’t complain.

I don’t see what the big deal is. You just let them come and take the blood from your arm and test it for steroids or whatever. With as many tattoos that Pacquiao has on his body, he should be fine with them sticking a needle him every now and then to get a small sample of blood. They weren’t going to turn Pacquiao into a human pin cushion.

* Share/Bookmark
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
The Mayweathers Carry The Burden of Proof

The burden of proof.

During my stint as a debating class student, we were told that anyone who has the guts to make serious accusations, claims, and other pieces of information that could prove vital and add more validity to his argument must present evidences to support such claim.

Such is the burden of proof.

In what is now a halted negotiation for the Pacquiao-Mayweather super fight, it is clear where the snag in the agreement process stems from. Right after Pacquiao scored a devastating second round-knockout victory over Ricky Hatton last May, Hatton’s then head trainer Floyd Mayweather Sr., made some serious comments that implied the probability of Pacquiao using illegal substances that could have boosted his performances and helped him campaign successfully through various weight classes.

As time went by, the accusations grew bolder and stronger and have recently hit fever pitch when the Mayweather camp insisted on an Olympic-style series of random drug test to “level the playing field.” For Pacquiao and his people, this demand is outrageously ridiculous and does not warrant any merit at all.

I agree.

See, the burden of proof falls on Mayweather Sr.’s shoulders. After all, it was he who made such accusations in the first place.

But did they show any evidence that Pacquiao is indeed taking performance-enhancing drugs? No. Did they have any charts or papers or test results that reveal any signs of steroids in Pacquiao’s system? No. Was there a point in time that they present a witness that says Pacquiao is indeed taking steroids? No, they did not.

The point being driven here is that the Mayweathers are pressing a claim that is unfounded and lacks substantial evidence. Unless they can present the boxing public with just a proof to support the allegations, then Pacquiao needs not to explain himself why he does not want to undergo any other drug tests other than those required by the Commission.

And if this was a debate, which in some way it is, the Mayweathers have a heavy burden on their shoulders right now.

Check my other boxing ramblings at http://boxerscamp.blogspot.co
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
The Rules Regarding Blood That May Put Mayweather-Pacquiao in the Crypt

BREAKING NEWS: PACQUIAO TO FILE SUIT AGAINST MAYWEATHERS BREAKING NEWS: PACQUIAO TO FILE SUIT AGAINST MAYWEATHERS



The Rules Regarding Blood That May Put Mayweather-Pacquiao in the Crypt

December 23rd, 2009

Paul Haberman Esq.

Bookmark and Share

A Look at the Anti-Doping Regulations That May Kill Boxing’s Mega- Fight of 2010 and How They Would be Adopted for The Mayweather-Pacquiao Bout


It is being widely reported this week that the proposed mega-fight between the two best fighters in professional boxing today, Filipino sensation Manny (Pac Man) Pacquiao and the undefeated Floyd (Money) Mayweather, Jr., tentatively scheduled for March 13, 2010, may now be in serious jeopardy. The reason: Pacquiao does not wish to contractually consent to Olympic-style drug testing procedures. According to Dan Rafael of ESPN.com:


“Olympic style drug testing is more rigorous than the drug testing performed by the Nevada State Athletic Commission [the commission with jurisdiction over Las Vegas’ MGM Grand, where the fight is reportedly now scheduled to be held] and other state commissions. It would involve random blood and urine testing before and after the fight. Nevada commission testing only tests urine for banned substances, only just before the fight and once immediately following the fight.”1


Mayweather, whose father has been quoted in the press since after Pacquiao’s November 14, 2009 bout with Miguel Cotto as saying that he believed that Pacquiao uses performance enhancing drugs, reportedly wants a provision for random drug testing in their bout agreement “to ensure fair play and sportsmanship by both fighters.”2 The Pacquiao camp, in turn, has reportedly stated that Pacquiao has difficulties with taking blood and does not wish to do so in close proximity to the fight.3 Regardless of the rationale, two of the many questions that arise are where exactly does this request find its origin, and what are some of the possible implications and extensions of contracting to Olympic-style drug testing? A quick analysis of each question follows.


The Regulatory Origins of Olympic-Style Drug Testing


2009 World Doping Code


The 2009 World Doping Code (“WDC”), as instituted by the World Anti-Doping Agency (“WADA”), the international anti-doping governing body for amateur sports, mandates that a given nation’s anti-doping agency “[p]lan and conduct an effective number of In-Competition and Out-of-Competition tests on Athletes over whom they have jurisdiction[.]” WDC Article 5.1. All such athletes shall be subject to the “whereabouts requirement” of WADA’s “International Standard for Testing.” Id. The “whereabouts requirement” mandates that an athlete that is selected for out-of-competition drug testing “shall provide accurate, current location information” such that they may be subjected to drug testing at all times prior to a competition.4 This requirement is in place so that a given agency knows where to find an athlete at all times for drug test administration. All such out-of-competition testing “shall be initiated and directed by both international and national organizations.” WDC Article 5.2.5


United States Olympic Committee National Anti-Doping Policies


As inferred above, WADA delegates some of its out-of-competition drug testing to an individual nation’s anti-doping agency. In the United States, the agencies that share that responsibility are the United States Olympic Committee (“USOC”) and the United States Anti-Doping Agency (“USADA”). Under the USOC’s National Anti-Doping Policies, effective January 1, 2009, all athletes that are eligible for inclusion on the United States Olympic or Paralympic Teams shall participate in a “registered testing pool”6 organized by USADA “for a period of at least 12 months before the commencement of the Games, provided, however, in exceptional circumstances, for good cause shown in writing, the USOC CEO may waive a portion of this 12 month period.” USOC National Anti-Doping Policies (“NADP”) at 4. During that 12 month period, their eligibility for participation in a given international competition can be revoked if they test positive for any number of a myriad of banned substances. USADA carves out an exception for “therapeutic use” that includes situations where “emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary.” 7 While other exceptions exist as well, this particular one could prove relevant to the discussion below, as there has been some history in boxing of “therapeutic use” claims in connection with positive drug testing.


Possible Implications and Extensions of Employing Olympic-Style Drug Testing Before Mayweather-Pacquiao


Despite the fairly long-winded summary of the regulatory foundation of Olympic-style drug testing above, its application in Mayweather-Pacquiao simply means that each boxer would be subject to random drug testing throughout the course of their respective training camps. WADA and USADA would be replaced in this instance by a neutral outside laboratory or agency selected by the camps to conduct the random testing. If the camps fully embrace the rules summarized above, both Mayweather and Pacquiao will be mandated to report where they are at all times to the selected outside laboratory or agency so that the laboratory or agency knows where to send its people for conduction of the random tests. Since this testing requirement would come about by contract and not by any governing law, it could theoretically be up to the camps whether or not to allow for a “therapeutic use” exception.”


If Pacquiao employs a similar training camp as he did for his bout with Cotto, a “whereabouts requirement” would mandate that Pacquiao had to report each and every time that he left Los Angeles, home of the Wild Card Gym, the base of operations for his lead trainer, Freddie Roach, and went over to his training facilities in Philippines, and vice versa. Likewise, should Mayweather decide to train outside of his home base in Las Vegas, at altitude in Big Bear, California, for example, he too would be responsible for immediately informing the designated laboratory or agency. Of these possible scenarios, the trickiest for random testing purposes would be when Pacquiao trains in the Philippines, which could result in sizeable expenses for the promoters if they have to pay to send the testing personnel overseas. However, if Pacquiao were not to be tested during any stay in the Philippines, it would be as if he had his own personal exception to the random drug testing rule for as long as he stayed there.


The possibility of employing the “therapeutic use” exception could potentially open the door to controversy, and indeed has throughout recent boxing history. Notably, former multi-division world champion James (Lights Out) Toney tested positive for the anabolic steroid nandrolone following his unanimous decision win over John (The Quiet Man) Ruiz for the World Boxing Association heavyweight championship in 2005. Toney vehemently denied using steroids for performance enhancement purposes. Instead, Toney alleged that he ingested nandrolone for therapeutic purposes, as it assisted in the recovery from an earlier biceps and triceps surgery. Nonetheless, Toney was stripped of the WBA title and his decision win was changed to a “no-contest” by the New York State Athletic Commission.


Here, a “therapeutic use” exception could prove useful to both boxers. As documented on the HBO Series “24/7” during Mayweather’s preparation for his bout for Britain’s Ricky Hatton, Mayweather’s body apparently requires a host of therapeutic treatments as a result of the wear and tear of his many years of being a top-shelf athlete. It certainly would not surprise anyone if Pacquiao had similar physical ailments, though they have not been documented in any of the “24/7” programs on his bouts. Regardless, if either one sustained an appreciable training injury that could either result in the fight being postponed or the use of an ordinarily banned substance to expedite treatment and preserve the date, Mayweather and Pacquiao would have some decisions to make.


One possible solution would be to incorporate a “therapeutic use” exception alongside a provision for submission to an independent medical examination after or just before the use of a banned substance, so that a neutral outside doctor selected by the aggrieved camp could evaluate the boxer at issue as to the severity of his injury and provide an opinion as to whether they is any alternative to using the banned substance to timely and effectively treat the alleged injury. This could get messy, however, as one party could theoretically then request a second examination by another outside doctor if they do not hear the answer they want. It may also end up being moot, since if the substance at issue is banned in Nevada and shows up during Nevada’s mandatory testing, the fight could be off or the decision changed to a no-contest anyway. More generally, such an examination could be disruptive to a training camp. Nonetheless, if the camps wanted safeguards in place in exchange for allowing a “therapeutic use” exception, and to minimize the controversy generated by any such use, an independent medical examination would be one avenue to consider.


In the end, whether Olympic-style drug testing of any form, or the bout as a whole, takes place in 2010 will come down to no more than whether Mayweather and Pacquiao’s people can iron out this difference over testing, and any others outstanding, in the coming weeks. As it is, the March 13, 2010 date cannot undergo much more delay in being made official, as press conferences have to be commenced, television production organized, and training camps formulated and begun. For the good of boxing’s continued climb back into the mainstream, here’s hoping they work this out soon and that Mayweather-Pacquiao does not get sent to the crypt over blood.



Paul Stuart Haberman, Esq. is an attorney at the New York law firm of Heidell, Pittoni, Murphy & Bach, LLP. He is also a New York State licensed boxing manager and the Chairman of the Sports Law Committee of the New York County Lawyers Association. He can be e-mailed at [email protected]. ©
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Roach BLASTS Mayweathers - "Mayweather is a coward!"

8CountNews contacted Freddie Roach to get his thoughts on the recent reports of Manny Pacquiao's refusal to give blood the day before the scheduled fight with Floyd Mayweather. Roach says that he is the one advising Manny not to give the blood the day before the fight. Roach blasts the Mayweather's calling them cowards, and scared. Check out what else Freddie Roach had to say in this exclusive 8CN interview.

8CN - Freddie, todays headlines all say that Manny Pacquiao is refusing to give blood the day before the fight. What is your response?

FR - Well the sanctioning bodies and the state commissions run the boxing world, not Floyd Mayweather. Who is this guy to tell us that we have to have blood tests, or urine tests, or any tests? He's just looking for a way out of the fight. He is scared, and he's just afraid that he's going to get his ass kicked. We don't work for Floyd Mayweather. We fight for the state commission, since when does the fighter make up the rules?

8CN - To play devils advocate, Floyd's people firmly believe that Manny is taking steroids. Why not just take the test and prove them wrong?

FR - So, what if I think Mayweather is taking steroids too?, so does that mean I go out and change the rules in boxing? This guy isn't going to walk all over us, he's not railroading us. This is bullshit, we will go by the rules of the commission, and that's it. We'll go on to other things, and he can make no money fighting some bum. My fighter is clean, I have trouble giving Manny protein shakes and vitamins, let alone steroids. We will pass the drug test, because my fighter is clean.

8CN - Is it Manny refusing to take the blood test or is it someone deciding for him?

FR - It's me, I am not going to let my fighter give blood a day before the fight.

8CN - What can giving blood a day before a fight do to a fighter?

FR - It's just like having sex before a fight. You're not supposed to have sex before a fight, it makes you weak. If you mentally think that, it will. When Manny gives blood it takes him 3 or 4 days to recover from it. I am not going to have my fighter going into a fight feeling weak and not sure of himself.

8CN - Is it true that Manny never wanted to give blood the day before any of his fights?

FR - We will never do it a day before a fight. We never flunked a urine test, and there is no reason to think my fighter is dirty. We have passed every test ever given to us. We go by the commission rules, not no rule Mayweather puts out there.

8CN - So it's fair to say that the ball is completely in Mayweathers court now, you guys are not budging?

FR - Yes it's fair to say that. If Floyd wants to fight us, then step up and fight us. If you want Manny to take a blood test after the fight, no problem, but not a day before.

8CN - Wouldn't a blood test the day after the fight be the same as a test a day before? I mean if Manny was taking steroids, wouldn't the test the day after the fight show the same thing as it would the day before?

FR - Yes agreed. A urine test will show the same thing too,but if they want a blood test the day after the fight, I have no problem with that. I will not have my guy giving blood a day before the fight, that will make him weak. Why is Floyd Mayweather dictating what we do in life? It's crazy... he's a coward and he's afraid to fight us and that is all there is to it.

8CN - If this fight gets scratched, what's next?

FR - We go up and get Yuri Foreman's title. We will go up one more weight division, just for you Floyd!
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Ten Great Fights That Should Happen in 2010

by James Slater - 2009 is almost over, and overall it was a good 12 months for boxing. However, as many great fights as were made in 2009, many potential match-ups sadly went unsigned. In this year-end article, I list ten fights that I'd love to see made in the coming 12 months.

From a purely selfish standpoint, the following (randomly listed) are the ten rumbles I want to see in 2010. See if you agree!

1: Manny Pacquiao-Floyd Mayweather Junior. An obvious choice, and hopefully a super-fight that will still go ahead despite the mess the hugely sought after fight is currently in. This one would be massive in terms of hype and it's highly likely the action would match the pre-fight stuff. If the welterweight mega-match doesn't happen, our sport will have severe problems living it down..

2: David Haye-Vitali or Wladimir Klitschko. Another obvious choice (imagine the flak I'd get if I left it off the list as a result!), loudmouth WBA champ Haye against either of the two giants would really be a highlight for the boxing fixtures of 2010. Is "The Hayemaker" as good as he says he is? Are the two brothers ready to be taken, their time of dominance over? Will the fight(s) end with a violent KO? These questions and others will be answered if Haye gets it on with one or both of the two "Doctors."

3: Paul Williams-Kelly Pavlik. One that got away from us in 2009, this hugely intriguing middleweight clash could, and hopefully will, happen in 2010. Hagler-Hearns, originally set for 1982, took three years to make, and maybe Pavlik-Williams will also prove to have been a fight that took a long time coming. Sure to be a real war with possibly multiple knockdowns, this match-up would thrill millions!

4: Chris Arreola-David Tua. A number of fans and experts have called for this fight long before me, and I agree how it would be a heavyweight slugfest that would dominate the heavyweight calendar as far as thrills in 2010. Not as significant as a Klitschko-Haye title fight, a battle between the two bangers who love to rumble would be a greater fight in all likelihood. Is it going too far to suggest Arreloa-Tua could be a modern day version of Foreman-Lyle? There's only one way to find out!

5: Amir Khan-Kevin Mitchell. An all-British super-fight that would be far, far better than a Khan-Ricky Hatton showdown. Mitchell, a fighter capable of slugging and - as we saw in his highly impressive points win over Breidis Prescott - boxing masterfully, could well be Britain's next boxing star. A fight between he and the also peaking Khan, at either 135 or 140 (probably the latter) could decide which lower weight warrior from the UK goes on to dominate for the years to come. Would we see a chess match or would we see a savage tear-up? Fingers crossed we find out.

6: Manny Pacquiao-Edwin Valero. Apologies for listing two Pacquiao fights, but as a backup plan to the possibly dead-in-the-water Mayweather fight, Pac-Man Vs. the lethal and unbeaten Venezuelan banger is almost as mouth-watering a prospect. Valero has been calling for the fight for a while now, and as big as he is, a move up to 140 would be realistic. With no way this fight could either go the distance or be in any way less than thrilling, who wouldn't want to see it - even if it had to take place in Texas or even outside the U.S?

7: Yuriorkis Gamboa-Juan Manuel Lopez. These two primed and peaking warriors are set to share their second card in January, when they meet Rogers Mtagwa and Steve Luevano, respectively, and if they both win the plan is for them to meet later in the year. Hopefully, neither guy will lose on Jan. 23rd, because this potential showdown has "classic" written all over it. Both guys are fast, skilled and they can both hit like hell. What's not to like?

8: Kendall Holt-Ricardo Torres III. These two light-welterweights gave us two great and highly controversial battles, the first in 2007, the second in 2008. Tied up at 1-1 as they are, Torres and Holt should actually have met again by now, as we know. Hopefully they will rumble in a decider in 2010. Very evenly matched and each having plenty to moan about due to the way they lost to the other, neither "Mochuelo" nor "Rated R" will feel satisfied until they've fought their rubber-match. Neither will the fans!

9: Floyd Mayweather-Shane Mosley. Again, an incredibly high quality back up plan of a fight in case the Mayweather-Pac-Man fight doesn't come off. I know there's not much chance of this match-up taking place, as "Sugar" has been asking for it, to no avail, for a long time - but this is a wish list, after all! Both guys are incredibly fast and highly skilled and they have a healthy dislike for one another. Both men are possible candidates for the 00's fighter of the decade (another article all by itself, that) and it would be fitting if they met in the first year of a new decade. Another fight with "classic" scrawled all over it!

10: Wladimir Klitschko-Vitali Klitschko. Talk about another fight that has next to no chance of happening! But who wouldn't want to watch this if it did ever happen? And who wouldn't be talking about it and having an opinion on it? A Klitschko-Klitschko showdown would almost certainly capture the imagination of millions the world over. In the past, the two brothers have spoken about this fight and how it could happen. Sure, it's highly likely both giants were messing with us, but who knows for sure? As to who'd win - I'd call this "dream fight" a pick 'em affair!
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
How Would The Fans Take To Pacquiao-Malignaggi?

by James Slater - With it now looking as though Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather Junior will only be meeting up for a fight in a courtroom, there has been much talk of "Pac-Man" moving on and fighting someone else on March 13th in Las Vegas. Wanting to box on the same date that was set for what would have been one of the biggest and possibly greatest fights in modern day boxing history, due to how his time will be taken up by his political goals later on next year, Pacquiao's name has now been linked with that of the recently rejuvenated Paulie Malignaggi.

Bob Arum has reportedly (via a number of sources) offered the fight to Malignaggi's promoter, Lou DiBella, and Team-Malignaggi is interested in taking the March bout. But how will the fans react if the pound-for-pound king does indeed wind up facing "The Magic Man" instead of "Money" next year? Obviously more than something of a letdown of a match-up compared to the two pound-for-pound rivals going at it with the entire world watching, Pacquiao-Malignaggi would likely struggle at the box office..

That said, and even though he's no puncher, New York's Malignaggi has been showing his best form in years just lately. Promising he'd get back to his old, effective, pre-trainer Buddy McGirt style for his fight with Juan Diaz, Paulie proved he was telling the truth. Robbed in the first Diaz fight, the demanded return saw Malignaggi win his biggest and most important fight for quite a while. But even with this newly reacquired form, has the man with just 5 KO's to his name as a pro really any shot at beating the lethal and speedy southpaw?

Malignaggi has some superb moves, and he has speed of his own; but enough to trouble the all-time great who has recently utterly destroyed the two men to have beaten him with no arguments? Ricky Hatton and before that, Miguel Cotto beat Malignaggi decisively, yet Pac-Man annihilated both guys. Going purely by form, then, Malignaggi would lose to Manny.

However, Malignaggi has wanted to fight Pacquiao before now (hasn't everyone at or around the 140-pound weight limit?) Prior to his ultimately losing fight with Hatton back in November of 2008, Malignaggi was angered at the way Pacquiao was talking about possibly getting the Hatton fight ahead of him and of beating Ricky even before Malignaggi had been given his chance at doing the same.

In an interview with this writer for this web site, Paulie told me the following on the subject of what he called Pacquiao's disrespect:

"I am really angry at the complete lack of respect Manny Pacquiao has been giving me. I mean, he's been talking about fighting Hatton next, when Hatton hasn't even got past me yet! I've worked very hard to get where I am in my career, and for Pacquiao to completely take that away from me by disrespecting me - that makes me really want to punish him after I beat Hatton."

Of course, Malignaggi was then pulled out very late in the November fight by then-trainer McGirt, ruining any chance Paulie had of facing Pacquiao. But there has at least been a deep motivation on his part to fight the Filipino legend for some time. Now, in light of the Mayweather situation, the 29-year-old New Yorker could see his chance reopen. Maybe it already has.

We'll likely have to wait until the holidays are over before we hear any more news on the subject, but the fast-talking slickster who is currently 27-3(5) looks to be the favourite to take the place of Mayweather and fight the most feared fighter on the planet next March.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Malignaggi eager to step in and fight Pacquiao – News

By Dave Lahr: Former International Boxing Federation light welterweight champion Paulie Malignaggi (27-3, 5 KO’s) is ready to step in for unbeaten Floyd Mayweather Jr. and fight Manny Pacquiao on March 13th. Malignaggi, 29, has been picked by Pacquiao’s promoter Bob Arum to be one of the possible replacements for Mayweather. Malignaggi is obviously overjoyed at being considered as an opponent for Pacquiao, because this will mean he would be getting the biggest payday of his career if he ends up being picked over the other fighters that Top Rank is considering.

Another fighter that is being considered is Yuri Foreman, the World Boxing Association light middleweight champion. This would give Pacquiao a chance to win an 8th world title if he were to beat Foreman. Of the current light middleweight champions, Foreman is considered by some to be the weakest of the current light middleweight champions, and thus possibly an easier target than the other champions Sergio Martinez, Cory Spinks, Sergeii Dzinziruk and Alfredo Angulo.

About the drug testing issue that has derailed Pacquiao’s fight with Mayweather, Malignaggi said this to Gman News – “I won’t mind if Manny [Pacquiao] refuses to submit a blood test the day before the fight. If Manny wants to submit to a blood test a month before the fight, it’s not a problem with me. I am even willing to submit to blood test 10 times a day before the fight if I am going to face Manny or Mayweather.” It’s clear that Malignaggi is eager to get the fight and the huge payday that goes with it. Naturally, he’s not going to make waves by asking Pacquiao to take random Olympic style blood tests like Mayweather was doing.

One worrisome problem about the selection of Malignaggi is his recent struggles in the ring. Malignaggi has been beaten two out of his last four fights, and despite the loss to Juan Diaz being controversial in their first fight, there’s no mistaking that Malignaggi struggled against the lightweight. Malignaggi was stopped in the 11th round by Ricky Hatton last year in a fight that wasn’t in the least bit close. Although Malignaggi has only three losses on his record, something that makes him look good, he hasn’t faced the tougher fighters in the division like Devon Alexander, Timothy Bradley, Kendall Holt, Victor Ortiz, Lamont Peterson, Ricardo Torres, Juan Urango, Nate Campbell, Victor Cayo, Amir Khan, Junior Witter and Andriy Kotelnik.

It would be hard to imagine that Malignaggi could beat any of those fighters. It’s possible he might be good enough to beat one, possibly two if he were to fight really well, but I suspect he would lose to all of them. This is why it seems disappointing that Malignaggi would be selected as Pacquiao’s opponent on March 13th. Things are still up in the air right now, but it’s looking like Malignaggi might be the one selected for Pacquiao. If that does happen, this will likely be a one-sided fight along the lines of Pacquiao’s 2nd round knockout win over Ricky Hatton in May.

Malignaggi doesn’t have the power to keep Pacquiao off and will probably be running for his life from the word go. It appears that Arum likes this fight for Pacquiao for some reason. It could be that he wants him to have an easy fight or maybe he sees the short terms benefit of having a slightly bigger named fighter going up against Pacquiao compared to other potential opponents like Bradley. Malignaggi might be better known, but he probably won’t make for an exciting fight because he likes to run a lot. Bradley would be more interesting because he goes right at his opponents and tries to beat them up.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Could Hatton/Marquez be fight of the year?

By Shaun Campbell: Styles make fights. Juan Manuel Marquez and Ricky Hatton were once the two most exciting fighters to come our of their respective countries in modern times. Although, they are not in their primes anymore, and some have that it is time for both men to hang up their gloves and enjoy retirement. Ricky Hatton was brutally knocked out in 2 rounds to pound for pound top man, Manny Pacquiao, and Juan Manuel Marquez is coming off a loss where he was outclassed by the superb Floyd Mayweather. So is this really a fight that could make fight of the year in 2010? Well, why not?

There’s no doubt that both men like a “tear up”. Both fighters have also stated that they want to go out in a rough, tough fight were neither man backs down. Hatton has stated that it is likely he will come back and fight again, and some reports have suggested he has even started training. These reports of Hatton in training are nothing new in Britain, he’s been doing gym work and in the boxing ring on bags and shadow boxing for months. Only light stuff yes, but maybe now he has cut out the junk food. There’s no point either Marquez or Hatton coming back for one last fight against a lesser opponent like Katsidis or Timothy Bradley. They aren’t planning to resurrect their careers, just one last fight for each of them to go out the way they want. But at the end of 12 rounds, someone has to lose.

It would be very surprising if the fight was at any other weight than 140 pounds. Even Light-welterweight may be a little too much for Marquez. He looked completely bloated in his bout against Mayweather, and there didn’t seem to be the muscle definition around his body. Can he afford to do this against arguably one of the top pound for pound body punchers in the sport? Some have suggest Marquez grew old during that Mayweather fight. He didn’t land much cleanly (but then again, who does against Mayweather?), and was knocked down by an impressive, yet not totally devastating shot. Having said this, there is no denying Juan Manuel’s heart. Credit should be given to Marquez, he isn’t a light-welterweight, but he is prepared to fight out of his comfort zone.

Hatton on the other hand is walking around at about 180 pounds at the moment so some reports suggest. There is no problem with the Hitman making weight, but how much will he have left after he does it? Is the punch resistance still there? Although the same question could be asked of Marquez. “No body fights 3 minutes of a round more consistently than Ricky Hatton” an expert once said during Hatton’s fight with Luiz Collazo in May 2006. Is it still the same Ricky Hatton? Against Manny Pacquiao the training camp went awfully. No weight training when a fighter has used weights to prepare for 40 other fights does affect your body. Ricky looked different at the weigh in.

This fight could very well be fight of 2010 with Pacquiao’s fight with Floyd Mayweather now seeming to be not happening. I doubt that fight would have lived up to the hype anyway. Remember the buzz surrounding Oscar De La Hoya vs Floyd Mayweather? Then remember the fight? Nothing special. Floyd Mayweather has a habit of being involved in boring fights. Hatton and Marquez only know how to fight one way, going forward. Both throw a lot of punches and don’t exactly concentrate on defence. So there is no point trying to make Marquez faster, no point making Hatton a pure, slick boxer. Just let them go out their, do what the do best, and fight like warriors.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
14 fighters to watch in 2010

By Gabriel Montoya

With 2009 behind us, it’s time to look forward to the New Year and the ever-growing, ever-changing crop of fighters rising through the ranks. Though there are more for sure, these are the fighters I look forward to seeing grow and make the move from prospect to contender. Also included is my prospect of the year and fighters only hardcore boxing heads know about who I think the networks and casual fans will become excited about in 2010.



Danny Jacobs (18-0 15 KOs): For my money, Danny Jacobs is “Prospect of the Year” and atop the list of fighters I am excited about coming into 2010. “The Golden Child” continued his steady progression this year by fighting five times in ’09 and stepping up the competition every time out. Once thought to be a power punching boxer, Jacobs has transitioned into more of a boxer first and puncher second. Using his 6’ 1” height and 73” reach, Jacobs has discovered the joys of the outside game and is clearly finding himself in the ring. I expect big things for Jacobs in the second half of next year now that he has a regional belt on his resume. Look for him to make a move at one of the champs at middleweight by year’s end.



The Main Event 300x250

Tavoris Cloud (20-0 with 18 KOs): Ok so he won a title this year but it was a vacant IBF title belt. I think, by now, you should all know how I feel about the belts. Great for Cloud, but until a guy takes on the top fighters in his division, the belt means nothing. Cloud’s all-action style and willingness to take on anyone is only hurt by the inactivity that has plagued him over the last year. He only had one fight but it was a doozy when he beat up and dominated Clinton Woods over 12 rounds, back in August. Now Cloud needs to get active and set himself up for fights with the likes of Chad Dawson. I think he has the tools and the talent to finish 2010 as the frontrunner for best light heavy in the world.



Kell Brook: (20-0 with 13 KOs): Won the British Young Boxer of the Year award and is the current British welterweight champion. This welterweight is the latest Frank Warren fighter to emerge out of Sheffield. He is about to take a big step up in Michael Jennings in February. As a fighter, Brook has all the intangibles: solid power, athleticism and speed coupled with solid skills. What we don’t know is how his chin is and how tough he is. Brooks’ problem as a fighter is that he is a headhunter. If Brooks can settle down a bit, mix in some feints and body work to go with his speed and lightning reflexes, he’ll be a problem for anyone. I would call Brooks more of a boxer type at this point; but he hasn’t had a ton of adversity. Much like Danny Jacobs, I think as his competition gets stiffer, Brooks’ true identity will emerge.



Matt Korobov (9-0 with 7 KOs): This southpaw middleweight is as good a prospect as they come but has hit a little bit of a technical snag after fighting seven times in ’09. Korobov started out blowing folks out of the water and is still knocking guys out. But it seems that movement and speed will trouble him a bit. Enter new trainer Kenny Adams; who Korobov’s manager Cameron Dunkin feels will give him inner city fighting savvy. Already a stalwart amateur, the addition of Adams brings new combinations, veteran tricks and exposure to styles he had not seen on the Euro amateur scene. Still a ways away from a title shot, I look for Korobov to continue his progression and be considered a top contender by year’s end.



Vanes Martirosyan: (26-0 with 17 KOs): Got a little derailed for a second there and seemed like he had peaked with the Bill Lyell fight. But a return to the Wild Card and trainer Freddie Roach has reinvigorated him and now Martirosyan fights with the fire and focus that is needed for a future world champion. Vanes is slated to take on Kassim Ouma in January in a fight that will show what he has against an experienced world class opponent. I look for Vanes to become a serious contender in the talented 154-pound division. With Top Rank and Bruce Trampler moving Martirosyan, the sky is the limit.



Mike Jones: (19-0 with 16 KOs): Slated to take on Henry Bruseles in February in a big step up for Jones. No TV deal has kept him largely in the dark but that should change in 2010 for this all action welterweight fighter with a pleasing TV friendly style. The talent rich 147-pound division just got a little more crowded.



Cesar Seda Jr. (18-0 with 14 KOs): This Puerto Rican flyweight prospect looks to shake things up in 2010. At 5’ 6” with an aggressive southpaw style, Seda is big enough and young enough that flyweight will just be a jumping-off point for this exciting young fighter.



Saul Alvarez (30-0 with 22 KOs): Had a busy 2009 with seven fights and is now poised to make a move in 2010. The come-forward fighter is a natural welterweight with good size (5’ 9”) and a good reach (71”). Matchups with the second tier of welters loom for him as Alvarez looks to get a foothold in a crowded division.



Nathan Cleverly: (18-0 with 8 KOs): Thanks to my buddy Simon for pointing out this cat. Cleverly can move, box and sits down and finding his punch. Though the KO ratio makes Cleverly seem like a feather-fisted British cutie, make no mistake, this guy can fight. Cleverly did what prospects should and fought four times in 2009 and is now fighting in January for the Euro light heavyweight title. It remains to be seen if Cleverly will take his act on the road to America or if he will be a Euro attraction; content to get a title and defend it on his home turf. In any case, I expect him to fight for a world title sometime late in 2010.



Hank Lundy (16-0-1 with 10 KOs): This junior welter with a switch-hitting style has power in both hands, a relentless style and a tough Philly fighter mentality. I expect to see more of Lundy on TV this year as he moves up the ranks of a 140-pound division that is quickly becoming as crowded and action packed as any division in boxing.



Abner Mares: (19-0 with 12 KOs): The time is now for the bantamweight, Mares, who has been dazzling us on undercards for the past couple years. Mares has not been the most active prospect in the past two years; fighting just four times, but the talent level for a world champion is there. If moved properly next year, Mares will be one we’ll all be talking about as a future pound for pounder and world champion.



Shawn Porter (12-0 with 10 KOs): As exciting a fighter as I have seen all year, Porter, the chief sparring partner for Manny Pacquiao, fights with the same energy and fire as the Filipino powerhouse. Porter finished up a solid nine-fight campaign in ’09 with the destruction of Jamar Patterson on the final Shobox card of the year. While Porter fights at 154 pounds, I expect him to move on down to 147. At 5’ 8”, Porter would be best served fighting guys closer to his size where his speed and power would be increased and serve him well as he makes the move to contender status over the next year.



Guillermo Rigondeaux: (4-0 with 3 KOs): This Cuban southpaw super bantamweight is as interesting a prospect as they come. Sure he has just four pro fights, but Rigondeaux boasts the experience of nearly 500 amateur bouts and countless amateur titles. Watching him at the Wild Card and in the ring, Rigondeaux seems to have everything it takes to be a world champ sooner rather than later. How soon is too soon is the question. I expect him to pick up the pace a little next year and be maneuvering for a title shot by the beginning of 2011. At age 29, the time was yesterday so Rigondeaux better get going.



James Kirkland (25-0 with 22 KOs): OK, OK. Yes, Kirkland is in jail and, yes, we have no idea if he will get out soon enough to make an impact on 2010. I say he does all of the above; gets a couple fights under his belt to shake the rust off and is right back in the title picture by the end of the year. Call me biased for championing the first prospect I ever saw in person and said would be a future champ. The junior middle firestorm is must see TV and boxing sorely missed Kirkland this year; in my opinion.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
ALEXANDER-MALIGNAGGI FEUD HEATING UP

By G. Leon

Cunningham on Malignaggi: "He's an overhyped manufactured product!"

It's getting serious now folks, as Devon Alexander manager Kevin Cunningham quickly snapped back at Malignaggi's manager Josh Dubin. "Now Paulie would beat Devon? Yeah, okay. Paulie's a nice kid, but he's been overhyped and if you look at his record, who has he beaten other than a shot lightweight? Has he beaten a top junior welterweight? Devon has beaten more former world champions at 22 than Maligaggi has his entire career. Devon is a champion at 22, who was Malignaggi fighting when he was at 22? And this 22 year old champion would fight Malignaggi anytime HBO wants to televise an execution. They just better make sure they got an ambulance on standby and a venue real close to a hospital, because accidents tend to happen when real champions are matched against manufactured products."
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
KEVIN CUNNINGHAM BLASTS TEAM MALIGNAGGI FOR FLIP FLOPPING ON PACQUIAO

By G. Leon

After wishing us a very Merry Christmas, Kevin Cunningham, manager and trainer of undefeated WBC junior welterweight champion Devon Alexander "The Great", was irate at the recent remarks made by Paul Malignaggi' and his manager Josh Dubin. "These guys are fake man. They're talking out of both sides of their neck. One minute they accuse the man of being on something and they next minute they ready to fight. He was one of the first people saying something aint right with Pacquiao, but now if there's a possibility for him to get a fight, Pacquiao is fine and ain't on nothing, said Cunningham. "And then for his manager Josh Dubin to say that Malignaggi and Pacquiao is the closest we could get to Mayweather and Pacquiao, is he crazy or does he think boxing fans are that stupid? You can't even put Malignaggi and Mayweather in the same sentence., the same way they would never put Paul Malignaggi in the ring with Devon." Needless to say Cunningham clearly believes that his charge bares a far greater resemblance to Mayweather than Malignaggi does. Remember where you heard it first
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
DUBIN RESPONDS TO CUNNINGHAM

By G. Leon

Former junior welterweight champ Paul Malignaggi's manager Josh Dubin quickly responded to Kevin Cunningham, "Kevin Cunningham could say what he wants and criticize people all he wants, because he seems to be good at that. We're confident in the NSAC and we're confident they would catch whatever Team Mayweather is alleging they (Team Pacquiao) are doing. I've never said anything about Pacquiao, so let's be clear on that. I also said that Pacquiao and Malignaggi would be a similar fight, Kevin could disagree with that, but if he wants to insult Paulie that's up to him."," said Dubin, who believes that Malignaggi would get his hand raised should he and Alexander ever share the same ring.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
DEVON ALEXANDER WANTS PACQUIAO, OR UNIFICATION ASAP

By G. Leon

"My goal is the become undisputed in my next two fights"

With Marcos Maidana "running scared", undefeated WBC junior welterweight champion Devon Alexander "The Great" is eager to mix it up with IBF junior welterweight champion Juan Urango. "Urango said he wants to unify and I'm with that," stated Alexander. "Then after I add the IBF belt to my collection, the only guy left standing in my way from becoming undisputed is Amir Khan. My goal is to become the undisputed junior welterweight champion in my next two fights." Needless to say if the Pacquiao-Mayweather fight winds up falling apart over Olympic style drug testing, Alexander is ready, willing and able to defend against Pacquiao under the full jurisdiction of the Las Vegas boxing commission. "Hell yeah, I'd fight him. If they can't get it together, all Bob Arum and them have to do is send us the contract. I'll sign in a second and he won't have to do nothing the Vegas commission don't want him to," said Alexander.
 
Aug 31, 2003
5,551
3,189
113
www.ebay.com
Cermeno/Valdez was a good fight too .. Cermeno now has back to back wins against Mijares and now a win over Valdez. If he didn't have such an "amateurish" style he'd be getting a lot more play. They should set up Moreno Vs. Cermeno to eliminate the interim WBA belt .. two extremely underrated bantamweights.
Valdez is still hospitalized after this bout from a blood clot in his brain. Hopefully he recovers .. I didn't even know he was hospitalized following this fight. He didn't take much punishment during the fight he was mostly just outboxed while Cermeno circled around him and then Cermeno went in for the kill in the 11th and put him away. Kind of surprised this happened considering.

I've been staying away from most boxing sites because of diva big fight soap operas. I hate big fight politics.