WIKILEAKS "POISON PILL" IS UFO DISCLOSURE?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Oct 30, 2002
11,091
1,888
113
www.soundclick.com
#41
ufo related: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/jan/10/earth-close-encounter-aliens-extraterrestrials

Evolution on alien worlds is likely to be Darwinian, which may mean extraterrestrials share our tendencies for violence and exploitation. Photograph: Rex
World governments should prepare a co-ordinated action plan in case Earth is contacted by aliens, according to scientists.

.
tahts because either tehy know for a fact that there are hostile aliens or they are figuring if we suck as a race then they do too.

its all speculation... unless they have proof
 
Oct 30, 2002
11,091
1,888
113
www.soundclick.com
#42
Sounds like an excuse to weaponize space and try to be the first country to make colonies in our orbit. Making power moves that are seemingly "for our safety".
The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) was created by U.S. President Ronald Reagan on March 23, 1983[1] to use ground and space-based systems to protect the United States from attack by strategic nuclear ballistic missiles. The initiative focused on strategic defense rather than the prior strategic offense doctrine of mutual assured destruction (MAD). The Strategic Defense Initiative Organization (SDIO) was set up in 1984 within the United States Department of Defense to oversee the Strategic Defense Initiative.
The ambitious initiative was "widely criticized as being unrealistic, even unscientific" as well as for threatening to destabilize MAD and re-ignite "an offensive arms race".[2] It was soon derided as Star Wars, after the popular 1977 film by George Lucas. In 1987, the American Physical Society concluded that a global shield such as "Star Wars" was not only impossible with existing technology, but that ten more years of research was needed to learn whether it might ever be feasible.[3]
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#52
uh. really? he's just saying reagan isnt a great person, like bush isnt very bright. you need a more detailed explanation?

Well since he gave no insight into why Reagan wasn't a great man, or Bush wasn't very bright....yeah I could use more info.

Otherwise his comment just sounds like a bunch of uninformed, peer group persuaded bullshit.

Especially considering that among past presidents Reagan often scores in the TOP 10 on public opinion polls.

*USPC 2011 poll rank - 8
*CSPAN 2009 poll rank - 10
*Wall Street Journal 2005 poll rank - 6

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States

And anyone with half a brain and an ounce of common sense would realize that anyone who goes to Harvard, has an MBA, is Governor, and makes it to the white house is probably much smarter than they are.

Not to mention, many credible people debunked the myth of George Bush being an idiot long ago.

http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/hoaxes/presiq.asp

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00524.x/abstract

http://www1.csbsju.edu/uspp/Election/bush011401.htm

But we do know that the young Bush registered a score of 1206 on the SAT, the most widely used test of college aptitude. (The more cerebral Al Gore obtained 1355.) Statistically, Bush's test performance places him in the top 16 percent of prospective college students
And scientists estimate an approximate .8 correlation between SAT and general intelligence.

http://pss.sagepub.com/content/15/6/373
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient#cite_note-109


Do you need a more detailed explanation?
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#54
Well since he gave no insight into why Reagan wasn't a great man, or Bush wasn't very bright....yeah I could use more info.

Otherwise his comment just sounds like a bunch of uninformed, peer group persuaded bullshit.

Especially considering that among past presidents Reagan often scores in the TOP 10 on public opinion polls.
I think people associate Reagan with the acceleration of capitalism and the corporate movement in the US, and in hindsight, depending on your position on how well the US is doing financially, that is up for debate.

*USPC 2011 poll rank - 8
*CSPAN 2009 poll rank - 10
*Wall Street Journal 2005 poll rank - 6
Goes to show you who the American people are as a whole, huh?

And anyone with half a brain and an ounce of common sense would realize that anyone who goes to Harvard, has an MBA, is Governor, and makes it to the white house is probably much smarter than they are.

Not to mention, many credible people debunked the myth of George Bush being an idiot long ago.

http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/hoaxes/presiq.asp

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00524.x/abstract

http://www1.csbsju.edu/uspp/Election/bush011401.htm



And scientists estimate an approximate .8 correlation between SAT and general intelligence.

http://pss.sagepub.com/content/15/6/373
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient#cite_note-109


Do you need a more detailed explanation?
While I agree with everything you are saying, getting into the White House is not synonymous with general, overall intelligence. However, money and a good campaign is. Hell, for all we know, his daddy bought his way into Harvard as well. No institution is above getting a nice chunk of funding from an alum...just ask Oregon.

No matter what his scores were, we all saw him make up words on TV and look like a bumbling idiot. I mean, it wasn't that big of a secret: he was openly ridiculed constantly in the media.

Either way, its all opinion. Bush Jr. may have scored well on aptitude tests, but he was a failure twice in business and to many, in the white house.
 
Jan 31, 2008
2,764
3,359
113
44
#55
And anyone with half a brain and an ounce of common sense would realize that anyone who goes to Harvard, has an MBA, is Governor, and makes it to the white house is probably much smarter than they are.
i dont know what going to harvard, having an MBA, being a governor and making it to the white house has anything to do with being smart.

maybe me and you define being smart differently.
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#56
i dont know what going to harvard, having an MBA, being a governor and making it to the white house has anything to do with being smart.

Yeah those are the definitely the marks of a dumb person. :paranoid:

I would even go so far as to say that there is no higher probability of the likelihood that a person with above described accomplishments is smarter than a high school graduate (aka average American). [/sarcasm]

Also, for the record, we aren't debating the possibility that GW is dumb, we are debating whether it is a fact he is dumb. Big difference.

maybe me and you define being smart differently.
You and I definitely define being smart differently. Ba-dump-bump-chhhh lol :classic:



Back later.
 

Legman

پراید آش
Nov 5, 2002
7,458
1,948
0
37
#58
no, HERESY i dont have anything to say

but i still stick to what i said

i still think hes stupid, and so is G. Bush, book smarts and common sense are 2 different animals
 

NAMO

Sicc OG
Apr 11, 2009
10,840
3,257
0
43
#60
WHY would they WANT to visit?
Exactly. As technologically advanced as we are, we are much less spiritually evolved as a whole. We're a bunch of monkeys with nuclear/biological weaponry, any intelligent race capable of traveling here would see that plain as day.
Has it ever occurred to you guys (and the ones that propped you) that we might have something of value? ie minerals on this planet they don't have or a shortage they have on theirs?

There are many reasons as to why aliens would want to visit/destroy/be nice or whatever.